The World Anti-Doping Agency is considering proposing a new rule that would bar
U.S. President Donald Trump and other U.S. government officials from attending
the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, the Associated Press reported on
Friday.
The proposal, which the agency is set to discuss on Tuesday, would introduce a
set of sanctions for countries that don’t pay their contributions by Jan. 31,
including “government representatives being excluded from participation in major
events such as World Championships and Olympic & Paralympic Games,” according to
the AP report.
The development comes amid ongoing tensions between the U.S. and WADA, with
Washington refusing to pay its annual dues to the anti-doping agency. The U.S.
reportedly owes around $3.7 million for 2025 and $3.6 million for 2024.
The U.S. has been withholding its contribution to WADA since 2023, due to
tensions over the scandal involving 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for
prohibited drugs before the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 but were still permitted to
take part in the Games.
WADA called the AP article “misleading” for suggesting this could impact the
upcoming World Cup, as “given that the rules would not apply retroactively, the
FIFA World Cup, LA and Salt Lake City Games would not be covered.”
Discussions related to the issue of governments unilaterally withholding funding
from WADA have been ongoing since early 2020 and have nothing specifically to do
with the U.S., the AP said, citing WADA spokesman James Fitzgerald.
The aim of the proposal is to “better protecting WADA’s funding so that it can
deliver on its global collaborative movement for doping-free sport,” according
to the AP report.
Tag - Anti-doping
Publishing the name of a professional athlete online because they have broken
anti-doping rules is against the EU’s privacy laws, a top EU lawyer has said.
The fresh opinion from Advocate General Dean Spielmann weighs a case taking
place in Austria, where four professional athletes who have broken anti-doping
rules are arguing that publication of their details online would breach the EU’s
General Data Protection Regulation.
Austrian law requires details including the athletes’ names, sporting
discipline, duration of their exclusion and the reasons for that exclusion to be
published on the websites of the Austrian anti-doping agency and an associated
legal committee.
Spielmann said he had “serious doubts” about the need to publish all those
details online, according to a court press release, on the basis that any
national laws that require personal data to be published have to be
proportionate.
He said publishing pseudonymized details on the internet would still deter
athletes from doping and prevent offenders from circumventing doping rules,
while also protecting the individual’s privacy.
The opinion is not binding but will inform the final decision at the Court of
Justice of the EU.