LONDON — For Keir Starmer, the crises and climbdowns just keep getting faster.
The British prime minister, facing questions about his judgment in appointing
Peter Mandelson as U.K. ambassador to Washington despite his Jeffrey Epstein
links, pledged on Wednesday to publish a cache of emails and texts between the
ex-Labour peer and his top team — on his own terms.
But hours later he was forced to toughen up independent scrutiny of this
document release in the face of a revolt by his own MPs, who are horrified by
the scandal and fear opposition accusations of a cover-up will stick.
Taken alone, this technical U-turn will not enter any history books. But the
last-minute drama around it puts the already weak Labour leader in further
peril.
Nervous MPs in his governing party, now awaiting the document dump with deep
unease, are rounding with renewed ferocity on the PM and his chief of staff
Morgan McSweeney.
POLITICO spoke to 20 Labour MPs and current and former officials for this piece.
“We need a head,” said one moderate Labour MP who entered parliament in 2024 and
was, like others quoted, granted anonymity to speak frankly.
“Someone has to pay the price for this failure,” a second, usually loyal, MP
from the 2024 intake said, adding they “wouldn’t care” who exactly it was.
In the minds of many of Labour’s own MPs and officials, the Mandelson affair has
further weakened Starmer and McSweeney, who pushed for the appointment of his
close ally and friend as ambassador in late 2024.
After rows over a succession of tax and policy U-turns, some believe the
Mandelson crisis exemplifies their criticisms of Starmer’s leadership — paying
too little attention to a potential problem until it blows up into a full-blown
scandal.
“I love Morgan, but Keir has to sack him and he should have sacked him a long
time ago,” said one Labour official who has long been loyal to the leadership.
“The problem is, who does Keir replace him with?”
TAINTED BY MANDELSON
Starmer defended McSweeney to the hilt on Wednesday.
“Morgan McSweeney is an essential part of my team,” he told MPs. “He helped me
change the Labour Party and win an election. Of course I have confidence in
him,” the PM said.
Some MPs also rallied around Starmer, blaming an overexcited media narrative and
MPs on edge for the next scandal. “This feels like a Westminster story at the
moment rather than something terminal for the PM in the eyes of the public,”
said a third Labour MP elected in 2024. But the mood in large parts of the party
on Wednesday night was bleak.
The latest round of bloodletting began in earnest on Monday, when emails
released as part of the Epstein files appeared to show Mandelson leaking
government financial discussions in the wake of the 2008 banking crash. Police
are now investigating allegations of misconduct in public office.
Mandelson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the police
investigation Tuesday evening. He has previously said he was wrong to have
continued his association with Epstein and apologized “unequivocally” to
Epstein’s victims.
Starmer, like the rest of the British state and public, insists he did not know
about the bombshell emails, and would never have appointed Mandelson if he did.
Having already sacked Mandelson in September he is now obliterating his
reputation, saying on Wednesday that Mandelson “lied repeatedly” during his
appointment as ambassador.
Yet it was well known that Mandelson came with baggage.
Starmer knew the former Labour Cabinet minister had been repeatedly sacked in
scandal — and confirmed at the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions session on
Wednesday that he had known Mandelson was friends with Epstein.
“That was the moment,” said a fourth, moderate Labour MP. “The mood was awful. I
had opposition MPs saying to me that they had not seen one that bad in decades.”
Several Labour MPs and officials who spoke to POLITICO voiced fears that
revealing details of the vetting process will paint Starmer and his chief of
staff as too incurious about the wider situation.
Mandelson had worked closely with McSweeney since the late 2010s and gave Labour
informal advice in the run-up to its 2024 election landslide.
One former No. 10 official said Mandelson was not on the list of potential
ambassadors until McSweeney took over as chief of staff in October 2024,
claiming: “Morgan didn’t do anything without speaking to Peter.”
“Once the timeline — and the degree to which searching questions were asked —
become clear, I think Morgan might be in trouble,” one U.K. government official
added.
Mandelson went through at least three layers of checks, a second U.K. government
official said.
Before his role was announced, the Cabinet Office carried out due diligence.
Afterward, he was subjected to full deep security vetting.
The third layer — and potentially the most problematic for Starmer and McSweeney
— was a letter to Mandelson before his appointment from the chief of staff on
the PM’s behalf. It asked three questions: why he continued contact with Epstein
after his conviction, why he was reported to have stayed in one of Epstein’s
home when the financier was in prison, and whether he was associated with a
charity founded by Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
A No. 10 official said reports that linked Mandelson to Epstein, including after
he was first convicted, had been looked into as part of the appointment process.
“Peter Mandelson lied to the Prime Minister, hid information that has since come
to light and presented Epstein as someone he barely knew,” the No. 10 official
added.
HURRY UP AND WAIT
Some Labour MPs — spooked by consistent polls putting Labour behind Nigel
Farage’s populist Reform UK — are so angry that they want to see regime change
immediately.
For many on Labour’s left or “soft left” flank this was simply a chance to push
their campaign against No. 10.
One former minister, already hostile to the leadership, said it felt like the
worst part of Starmer’s premiership and McSweeney should go now.
Left-wing former Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn, long cast out of the party over
comments on antisemitism, went on Sky News to say Starmer may even be challenged
before local elections, which will be held across the U.K. in May.
Others were new converts to immediate action. A fifth Labour MP, a moderate who
entered parliament in 2024, also said McSweeney should go now. They lamented the
“blind spot for many in the leadership” who allowed Mandelson to become
ambassador.
It has left some MPs angry and dejected. One, Sarah Owen, made an impassioned
intervention in Wednesday’s debate: “Don’t we need to put the victims at the
heart of this, not just ourselves?”
But they will have to wait if they want the facts behind the case to become
clear.
MPs agreed on Wednesday night to release a series of documents concerning the
diligence and vetting around Mandelson’s appointment, as well as communications
he had with McSweeney, ministers, civil servants and special advisers in the six
months before his appointment.
Starmer had intended to block the release of any documents that would prejudice
U.K. national security or international relations.
But No. 10 staged a late climbdown after Angela Rayner — a key figure among MPs
on Labour’s “soft left” who resigned as deputy prime minister amid a housing
scandal in September — called for parliament’s Intelligence and Security
Committee (ISC) to have a role. Officials scrambled to compile a new amendment
that would give the ISC the final say on what is blocked.
It will likely take days or weeks for the government to work through what needs
to be released, and far longer for the ISC to work through the most contentious
documents after that.
The Met Police also released a statement on Wednesday night warning the release
of specific documents “could undermine” its current investigation into
Mandelson’s alleged misconduct in public office.
The releases — which could include Mandelson’s private messages to friends in
the Cabinet, such as Health Secretary Wes Streeting — will provide easy fodder
to a British media gripped by the stories of Epstein’s friendships with
Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew.
But most MPs and officials who spoke to POLITICO agreed that No. 10 and
McSweeney stand to lose the most.
A second former No. 10 official said: “Lots of people are nice to creepy people
in politics. But when it comes down to the brass tacks of who knew what or did
what when they made the appointment — that’s the chopping block stuff.”
A sixth Labour MP, on the left of the party, said even frontbenchers were
“questioning why they should jeopardise their own positions to protect one
individual [McSweeney].”
But the question of “when” remains a key one.
One Labour figure loyal to Starmer’s No. 10 admitted there will be pressure for
McSweeney to go now, but insisted anyone with an ounce of political sense would
delay any move against him until after local elections in May — so that he could
absorb the blame for any losses and protect the PM.
Even a staunch ally of McSweeney — who has been at Starmer’s side since he first
ran to be Labour leader — said they had no idea if he will survive.
But a seventh Labour MP, elected in 2024, thinks questions over McSweeney’s
future are a red herring. “It’s ultimately about the PM’s judgement,” they said.
The fourth Labour MP quoted above added: “If one of them goes, the other one has
to go too.”
Esther Webber contributed reporting.
Tag - Security
The EU’s top sports official has sharply criticized FIFA President Gianni
Infantino for saying that world football’s governing body should lift its ban on
Russia competing in international tournaments.
Infantino said Monday that Russia, which was banned by FIFA following the
country’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, should be allowed to
compete again, claiming that bans and boycotts “create more hatred.” It would
send a positive message to have “girls and boys from Russia” participating in
football tournaments across Europe, he added.
European Sport Commissioner Glenn Micallef pushed back Wednesday, calling
for the ban to remain in place in a social media post with the hashtag
#YellowCardForFIFA.
“Sport does not exist in a vacuum. It reflects who we are and what we choose to
stand for,” Micallef said. “Letting aggressors return to global football as if
nothing happened ignores real security risks and deep pain caused by the war.”
Infantino’s remarks also drew a furious response from Ukraine.
“679 Ukrainian girls and boys will never be able to play football — Russia
killed them,” said Ukraine’s Foreign Affairs Minister Andrii Sybiha on social
media. “And it keeps killing more while moral degenerates suggest lifting bans,
despite Russia’s failure to end its war.”
Moscow, unsurprisingly, embraced Infantino’s suggestion. “We have seen these
statements [by Infantino], and we welcome them,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov
said. “It’s high time to think about this.”
The U.S. is hosting the men’s World Cup this summer together with Mexico and
Canada. Even if the ban were lifted, Russia could not compete as it did not take
part in the qualifying rounds.
Infantino maintains close ties with Donald Trump and in December gave him the
newly created FIFA Peace Prize — widely seen as a token honor — after the
American president was not awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
The sporting world is increasingly softening in its stance on Russian
participation in tournaments, with International Olympic Committee President
Kirsty Coventry signaling that Russian athletes shouldn’t be held responsible
for the actions of their government.
LONDON — Keir Starmer will strive for “maximum transparency” when releasing
files on Peter Mandelson’s appointment as British ambassador to the U.S., a
senior U.K. minister said Wednesday.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the prime minister wants to release as much
information into the public domain about how Mandelson was appointed, his
correspondence with ministers and his subsequent sacking last September over the
former Labour peer’s friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“The prime minister’s going for maximum transparency here,” Streeting, a former
friend of Mandelson, told Sky, though added the PM is “obviously drawing a line”
by “not releasing information where it might compromise our national security
and our security services, or where there may be information in there that might
undermine international relations with other countries.”
The opposition Conservatives have put forward a humble address — a parliamentary
message to King Charles that was favored by Starmer during his time as leader of
the opposition — calling for “all papers” relating to Mandelson’s appointment
last year to be published.
These include “due diligence which was passed to Number 10,” conflict of
interest forms over his work in Russia and China, and correspondence (including
electronic communications) between Mandelson, ministers and the PM’s Chief of
Staff Morgan McSweeney — who encouraged Starmer to send the then Labour peer to
Washington.
The government has published an amendment to the address accepting the Tories’
request, with the caveat that it will exclude “papers prejudicial to U.K.
national security or international relations.”
U.K. lawmakers will debate the substance of what should be released this
afternoon.
“What we’ve seen in recent days also is a prime minister acting rapidly to make
sure that Peter Mandelson is stripped of all of the titles and privileges that
were conferred on him through public service,” Streeting told the BBC, calling
his behavior “so jaw-droppingly stupid and outrageous.”
The Metropolitan Police confirmed Tuesday evening that Mandelson is under
investigation for alleged misconduct in public office after it appeared he
leaked sensitive government discussions at the height of the financial crisis to
the late financier.
Mandelson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the
investigation on Tuesday evening. He has previously said he was wrong to have
continued his association with Epstein and apologized “unequivocally” to
Epstein’s victims.
And in a Times Newspaper interview that was conducted before the most recent
batch of Epstein files were released, Mandelson attempted to explain his
historic association with the disgraced financier.
“I don’t know what his motives were — probably mixed — but he provided guidance
to help me navigate out of the world of politics and into the world of commerce
and finance,” Mandelson told the newspaper.
Mandelson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the
investigation on Tuesday evening.
Mandelson also resigned from the House of Lords and left Labour following the
latest tranche of correspondence in the Epstein Files.
The Trump administration wants to work with traditional allies to secure new
supplies of critical minerals. But months of aggression toward allies,
culminating with since-aborted threats to seize Greenland, have left many cool
to the overtures.
While the State Department has drawn a lengthy list of participating countries
for its first Critical Minerals Ministerial scheduled for Wednesday, a number of
those attending are hesitant to commit to partnering with the U.S. in creating a
supply chain that bypasses China’s current chokehold on those materials,
according to five Washington-based diplomats of countries invited to or
attending the event.
State Department cables obtained by POLITICO also show wariness among some
countries about signing onto a framework agreement pledging joint cooperation in
sourcing and processing critical minerals.
Representatives from more than 50 countries are expected to attend the meeting,
according to the State Department — all gathered to discuss the creation of tech
supply chains that can rival Beijing’s.
But the meeting comes just two weeks since President Donald Trump took to the
stage at Davos to call on fellow NATO member Denmark to allow a U.S. takeover of
Greenland, and that isn’t sitting well.
“We all need access to critical minerals, but the furor over Greenland is going
to be the elephant in the room,” said a European diplomat. In the immediate
run-up to the event there’s “not a great deal of interest from the European
side,” the person added.
The individual and others were granted anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic
relationships.
Their concerns underscore how international dismay at the Trump administration’s
foreign policy and trade actions may kneecap its other global priorities. The
Trump administration had had some success over the past two months rallying
countries to support U.S. efforts to create secure supply chains for critical
minerals, including a major multilateral agreement called the Pax Silica
Declaration. Now those gains could be at risk.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio wants foreign countries to partner with the U.S.
in creating a supply chain for the 60 minerals (including rare earths) that the
U.S. Geological Survey deems “vital to the U.S. economy and national security
that face potential risks from disrupted supply chains.” They include antimony,
used to produce munitions; samarium, which goes into aircraft engines; and
germanium, which is essential to fiber-optics. The administration also launched
a $12 billion joint public-private sector “strategic critical minerals
stockpile” for U.S. manufacturers, a White House official said Monday.
Trump has backed away from his threats of possibly deploying the U.S. military
to seize Greenland from Denmark. But at Davos he demanded “immediate
negotiations” with Copenhagen to transfer Greenland’s sovereignty to the U.S.
That makes some EU officials leery of administration initiatives that require
cooperation and trust.
“We are all very wary,” said a second European diplomat. Rubio’s critical
minerals framework “will not be an easy sell until there is final clarity on
Greenland.”
Trump compounded the damage to relations with NATO countries on Jan. 22 when he
accused member country troops that deployed to support U.S. forces in
Afghanistan from 2001 to 2021 of having shirked combat duty.
“The White House really messed up with Greenland and Davos,” a third European
diplomat said. “They may have underestimated how much that would have an
impact.”
The Trump administration needs the critical minerals deals to go through. The
U.S. has been scrambling to find alternative supply lines for a group of
minerals called rare earths since Beijing temporarily cut the U.S. off from its
supply last year. China — which has a near-monopoly on rare earths — relented in
the trade truce that Trump brokered with China’s leader Xi Jinping in South
Korea in October.
The administration is betting that foreign government officials that attend
Wednesday’s event also want alternative sources to those materials.
“The United States and the countries attending recognize that reliable supply
chains are indispensable to our mutual economic and national security and that
we must work together to address these issues in this vital sector,” the State
Department statement said in a statement.
The administration has been expressing confidence that it will secure critical
minerals partnerships with the countries attending the ministerial, despite
their concerns over Trump’s bellicose policy.
“There is a commonality here around countering China,” Ruth Perry, the State
Department’s acting principal deputy assistant secretary for ocean, fisheries
and polar affairs, said at an industry event on offshore critical minerals in
Washington last week. “Many of these countries understand the urgency.”
Speaking at a White House event Monday, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum indicated
that 11 nations would sign on to a critical minerals framework with the United
States this week and another 20 are considering doing so.
Greenland has rich deposits of rare earths and other minerals. But Denmark isn’t
sending any representatives to the ministerial, according to the person familiar
with the event’s planning. Trump said last month that a framework agreement he
struck with NATO over Greenland’s future included U.S. access to the island’s
minerals. Greenland’s harsh climate and lack of infrastructure in its interior
makes the extraction of those materials highly challenging.
Concern about the longer term economic and geostrategic risks of turning away
from Washington in favor of closer ties with Beijing — despite the Trump
administration’s unpredictability — may work in Rubio’s favor on Wednesday.
“We still want to work on issues where our viewpoints align,” an Asian diplomat
said. “Critical minerals, energy and defense are some areas where there is hope
for positive movement.”
State Department cables obtained by POLITICO show the administration is leaning
on ministerial participants to sign on to a nonbinding framework agreement to
ensure U.S. access to critical minerals.
The framework establishes standards for government and private investment in
areas including mining, processing and recycling, along with price guarantees to
protect producers from competitors’ unfair trade policies. The basic template of
the agreement being shared with other countries mirrors language in frameworks
sealed with Australia and Japan and memorandums of understanding inked with
Thailand and Malaysia last year.
Enthusiasm for the framework varies. The Philippine and Polish governments have
both agreed to the framework text, according to cables from Manila on Jan. 22
and Warsaw on Jan. 26. Romania is interested but “proposed edits to the draft
MOU framework,” a cable dated Jan. 16 said. As of Jan. 22 India was
noncommittal, telling U.S. diplomats that New Delhi “could be interested in
exploring a memorandum of understanding in the future.”
European Union members Finland and Germany both expressed reluctance to sign on
without clarity on how the framework aligns with wider EU trade policies. A
cable dated Jan. 15 said Finland “prefers to observe progress in the EU-U.S.
discussions before engaging in substantive bilateral critical mineral framework
negotiations.” Berlin also has concerns that the initiative may reap “potential
retaliation from China,” according to a cable dated Jan. 16.
Trump’s threats over the past two weeks to impose 100 percent tariffs on Canada
for cutting a trade deal with China and 25 percent tariffs on South Korea for
allegedly slow-walking legislative approval of its U.S. trade agreement are also
denting enthusiasm for the U.S. critical minerals initiative.
Those levies “have introduced some uncertainty, which naturally leads countries
to proceed pragmatically and keep their options open,” a second Asian diplomat
said.
There are also doubts whether Trump will give the initiative the long-term
backing it will require for success.
“There’s a sense that this could end up being a TACO too,” a Latin American
diplomat said, using shorthand for Trump’s tendency to make big threats or
announcements that ultimately fizzle.
Analysts, too, argue it’s unlikely the administration will be able to secure any
deals amid the fallout from Davos and Trump’s tariff barrages.
“We’re very skeptical on the interest and aptitude and trust in trade
counterparties right now,” said John Miller, an energy analyst at TD Cowen who
tracks critical minerals. “A lot of trading partners are very much in a
wait-and-see perspective at this point saying, ‘Where’s Trump really going to go
with this?’”
And more unpredictability or hostility by the Trump administration toward
longtime allies could push them to pursue critical mineral sourcing arrangements
that exclude Washington.
“The alternative is that these other countries will go the Mark Carney route of
the middle powers, cooperating among themselves quietly, not necessarily going
out there and saying, ‘Hey, we’re cutting out the U.S.,’ but that these things
just start to crop up,” said Jonathan Czin, a former China analyst at the CIA
now at the Brookings Institution. “Which will make it more challenging and allow
Beijing to play divide and conquer over the long term.”
Felicia Schwartz contributed to this report.
BRUSSELS — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is planning to
travel to Australia this month to clinch a security and trade deal, according to
a person familiar with the talks.
Her trip will follow a meeting next week between European Trade Commissioner
Maroš Šefčovič and his Australian counterpart Don Farrell in Brussels, a second
person said. Both people were granted anonymity because the schedules are still
tentative.
The EU and Canberra are moving to revive trade negotiations that collapsed at
the end of 2023 amid disagreements over quotas of beef and lamb.
The quotas are still being negotiated between Canberra and Brussels, the first
person familiar with the talks said.
Von der Leyen will take the 20-hour-plus flight to Australia directly after she
attends the Munich Security Conference, which takes place in the German city on
Feb. 13-15, according to Australian digital newspaper The Nightly, which broke
the news of the Commission chief’s four-day trip.
EU countries last December allowed the Commission to negotiate a defense deal
with Australia. Sealing such a deal would come on the heels of security and
defense partnerships signed with the U.K., Canada and most recently India.
An agreement with Australia would represent a win for the EU, as it would open
access to the country’s vast reserves of strategic minerals. Australia is the
world’s largest producer of lithium and also holds the world’s second-largest
copper reserves.
Coming after the EU’s fraught Mercosur deal with South American countries —
criticized by farmers, France and skeptical lawmakers — the pact with Canberra
is expected to also trigger pushback due to its significant agricultural
component.
BERLIN — Friedrich Merz embarks on his first trip to the Persian Gulf region as
chancellor on Wednesday in search of new energy and business deals he sees as
critical to reducing Germany’s dependence on the U.S. and China.
The three-day trip with stops in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab
Emirates illustrates Merz’s approach to what he calls a dangerous new epoch of
“great power politics” — one in which the U.S. under President Donald Trump is
no longer a reliable partner. European countries must urgently embrace their own
brand of hard power by forging new global trade alliances, including in the
Middle East, or risk becoming subject to the coercion of greater powers, Merz
argues.
Accompanying Merz on the trip is a delegation of business executives looking to
cut new deals on everything from energy to defense. But one of the chancellor’s
immediate goals is to reduce his country’s growing dependence on U.S. liquefied
natural gas, or LNG, which has replaced much of the Russian gas that formerly
flowed to Germany through the Nord Stream pipelines.
Increasingly, German leaders across the political spectrum believe they’ve
replaced their country’s unhealthy dependence on Russian energy with an
increasingly precarious dependence on the U.S.
Early this week, Merz’s economy minister, Katherina Reiche, traveled to Saudi
Arabia ahead of the chancellor to sign a memorandum to deepen the energy ties
between both countries, including a planned hydrogen energy deal.
“When partnerships that we have relied on for decades start to become a little
fragile, we have to look for new partners,” Reiche said in Riyadh.
‘EXCESSIVE DEPENDENCE’
Last year, 96 percent of German LNG imports came from the U.S, according to the
federal government. While that amount makes up only about one-tenth of the
country’s total natural gas imports, the U.S. share is set to rise sharply over
the next years, in part because the EU agreed to purchase $750 billion worth of
energy from the U.S. by the end of 2028 as part of its trade agreement with the
Trump administration.
The EU broadly is even more dependent on U.S. LNG, which accounted for more than
a quarter of the bloc’s natural gas imports in 2025. This share is expected to
rise to 40 percent by 2030.
German politicians across the political spectrum are increasingly pushing for
Merz’s government to find new alternatives.
“After Russia’s war of aggression, we have learned the hard way that excessive
dependence on individual countries can have serious consequences for our
country,” said Sebastian Roloff, a lawmaker focusing on energy for the
center-left Social Democrats, who rule in a coalition with Merz’s conservatives.
Roloff said Trump’s recent threat to take over Greenland and the new U.S.
national security strategy underscored the need to “avoid creating excessive
dependence again” and diversify sources of energy supply.
The Trump administration’s national security strategy vows to use “American
dominance” in oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy to “project power” globally,
raising fears in Europe that the U.S. will use energy exports to gain leverage
over the EU.
Last year, 96 percent of German LNG imports came from the U.S, according to the
federal government. | Pool photo by Lars-Josef Klemmer/EPA
That’s why Merz and his delegation are also seeking closer ties to Qatar, one of
the world’s largest producers and exporters of natural gas as well as the United
Arab Emirates, another major LNG producer.
Last week, the EU’s energy chief, Dan Jørgensen, said the bloc would step up
efforts to to reduce it’s dependence on U.S. LNG., including by dealing more
with Qatar. One EU diplomat criticised Merz for seeking such cooperation on a
national level. Germany is going “all in on gas power, of course, but I can’t
see why Merz would be running errands on the EU’s behalf,” said the diplomat,
speaking on condition of anonymity.
‘AUTHORITARIAN STRONGMEN’
Merz will also be looking to attract more foreign investment and deepen trade
ties with the Gulf states as part of a wider strategy of forging news alliances
with “middle powers” globally and reduce dependence on U.S. and Chinese markets.
The EU initiated trade talks with the United Arab Emirates last spring.
Gulf states like Saudi Arabia also have their own concerns about dependencies on
the U.S., particularly in the area of arms purchases. Germany’s growing defense
industry is increasingly seen as promising partner, particularly following
Berlin’s loosening of arms export restrictions.
“For our partners in the region, cooperation in the defense industry will
certainly also be an important topic,” a senior government official with
knowledge of the trip said.
But critics point out that leaders of autocracies criticized for human rights
abuses don’t make for viable partners on energy, trade and defense.
Last week, the EU’s energy chief, Dan Jørgensen, said the bloc would step up
efforts to to reduce it’s dependence on U.S. LNG., including by dealing more
with Qatar. | Jose Sena Goulao/EPA
“It’s not an ideal solution,” said Loyle Campbell, an expert on climate and
energy policy for the German Council on Foreign Relations. “Rather than having
high dependence on American LNG, you’d go shake hands with semi-dictators or
authoritarian strongmen to try and reduce your risk to the bigger elephant in
the room.”
Merz, however, may not see a moral contradiction. Europe can’t maintain its
strength and values in the new era of great powers, he argues, without a heavy
dollop of Realpolitik.
“We will only be able to implement our ideas in the world, at least in part, if
we ourselves learn to speak the language of power politics,” Merz recently said.
Ben Munster contributed to this report.
LONDON — Peter Mandelson spent four decades helping build Britain’s Labour
establishment. Now it’s decisively cutting him adrift.
Former colleagues in the Cabinet and Labour Party officialdom lined up to
blowtorch Britain’s former ambassador to the U.S. on Tuesday after newly
released files suggested he leaked sensitive government financial discussions to
the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2009.
“The latest revelations are materially different to the unpleasant sleaze of
previous revelations,” David Blunkett, a former home secretary under Tony Blair,
told POLITICO. “This is about conduct in a public office, betrayal of colleagues
and a dereliction of duty.”
Geoff Hoon, Blair’s former defense secretary, told GB News it was “very
disturbing,” while Labour grandee Harriet Harman told BBC radio: “I was of the
view that Peter Mandelson was untrustworthy from the 1990s.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer sacked the so-called “prince of darkness” as
Britain’s envoy to Washington in September as the extent of his friendship with
Epstein became clear. But to many former colleagues, Monday’s revelation that
Mandelson allegedly disclosed internal emails went much further — and will
trigger, they believe, the end of his time in public life.
Mandelson declined to comment for this piece. He has previously said he was
wrong to have continued his association with Epstein and apologized
“unequivocally” to Epstein’s victims.
Starmer said on Saturday that he had “nothing more to say” on Mandelson. That
didn’t last. Smelling public outrage, the PM told his Cabinet Tuesday that the
fresh allegations were “disgraceful.”
Mandelson, 72, quit his seat for life in the House of Lords on Tuesday after
Starmer — having earlier declined to do so — said ministers would draft a law to
remove him from the upper house. Police are reviewing whether the allegations
could amount to misconduct in a public office.
Ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown — who brought Mandelson back into government in
2008 — issued a statement tearing into the “shocking” revelations, and revealing
he asked civil servants to investigate Mandelson’s communications with Epstein
in September. Brown also contacted police Tuesday.
One former diplomat, granted anonymity to speak undiplomatically, called the
flurry of statements a “public lynching.” They added: “He’s going now through
Dante’s seven circles of hell, and every time it looks like he’s reached the
bottom, another circle appears.”
One of British politics’ greatest survivors, Mandelson has not arrived at the
last circle yet.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer sacked the so-called “prince of darkness” as
Britain’s envoy to Washington in September as the extent of his friendship with
Epstein became clear. | Tolga Akmen/EPA
Several of his close personal allies kept their counsel when contacted on
Tuesday. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has not yet decided to comment.
Another of Labour’s most senior figures told POLITICO that they had no
publishable comment.
But Luke Sullivan, who was a junior special adviser in the late 2000s, and later
became Starmer’s political director in opposition, said: “I cannot tell you how
angry people are.”
Another former aide from the New Labour years, granted anonymity to speak
frankly, added: “Bloody hell, it is worse than we thought. People feel
justifiably sad and angry. This is not a story of people turning on him. It’s
more like a Greek tragedy — Peter has been brought down by his fatal flaw, and
it’s a flaw that people were always aware of.”
AT THE HEART OF POWER
Whenever Labour reached a turning point in its recent history, Mandelson was
somehow there.
Pairing a smooth-talking style with ruthless maneuvering behind the scenes, he
began as the party’s communications director in 1985 and embarked on a mission
with then-leader Neil Kinnock to drag his party back from the left. He became MP
for Hartlepool in 1992, playing a key role in Blair’s 1994 election as party
leader and Labour’s 1997 general election landslide.
He was never far from scandal, resigning from the Cabinet first in 1998 over a
loan he took from a colleague, then again in 2001 in a row over a passport
application from an Indian billionaire.
Yet his attraction to power and strategic skills made his return inevitable. In
2008, already back as Britain’s EU trade commissioner, he repaired ties with
Brown, who had recently become prime minister, in an hour-long private meeting
in Brussels, before returning to the heart of government. The next year, when
Cabinet minister James Purnell resigned and called on Brown to stand aside,
Mandelson is said to have come into No. 10 and persuaded the rebels to back
down.
Peter Mandelson began as the party’s communications director in 1985 and
embarked on a mission with then-leader Neil Kinnock to drag his party back from
the left. | Will Oliver/EPA
Nigel Farage, leader of the populist right-wing party Reform UK, said on
Tuesday: “He’s very articulate. He’s highly intelligent. He’s incredibly
well-briefed, probably the best networker in Westminster in the last 30 years.”
“[On] the actual subject, the brief … I’d never heard anybody as impressive in
all my 20 years in the European Parliament. The guy is very, very bright, but
clearly has a taste for money, and has a taste for bad company.”
Labour went on to lose the 2010 election — though by a slimmer margin than many
expected — and Mandelson co-founded a lobbying firm, Global Counsel. (The firm
began cutting ties with him last year.) But in the late 2010s, he returned to
politics, striking up a close professional relationship with Morgan McSweeney,
now Starmer’s chief of staff. Along with other Labour aides, the pair attended
dinners at the south London home of the Labour peer Roger Liddle to discuss how
best to wrestle Labour back (again) from the left.
His advice became more valued in the run-up to the 2024 election. He even
co-presented a podcast, produced by The Times newspaper, called “How To Win An
Election.”
And late in 2024 — at the suggestion of McSweeney, despite concerns elsewhere in
government — Mandelson bagged his biggest prize yet: the ambassadorship to
Washington.
Starmer jokingly compared Mandelson to Donald Trump in a February 2025 speech at
the embassy: “You can sense that there’s a new leader. He’s a true one-off, a
pioneer in business, in politics. Many people love him. Others love to hate him.
But to us, he’s just … Peter.”
TURNING ON MANDELSON
In four decades, Mandelson made plenty of enemies who are now glad to see his
demise. The difference with this scandal may be the reaction of those close to
him.
Nigel Farage, leader of the populist right-wing party Reform UK, said on
Tuesday: “He’s very articulate. He’s highly intelligent. He’s incredibly
well-briefed, probably the best networker in Westminster in the last 30 years.”
| Andy Rain/EPA
Wes Streeting, Starmer’s telegenic health secretary, who shares many aspects of
Mandelson’s politics and is widely expected to be a future leadership contender,
was at some of the Liddle dinners. He told the BBC: “This is a betrayal on so
many levels. It is a betrayal of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein that he
continued that association and that friendship for so long after his conviction.
It is a betrayal of just not one, but two prime ministers.”
Privately, Mandelson is said to believe he was simply casting around for advice
during the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. He told the Times: “There was
no reason to shun his advice, but I was too trusting.” He added: “Work has
always defined me. Everything else has always been an add-on. So I will find
things to do.”
But one serving Labour official in government said the revelations were
“qualitatively (and quantitatively) worse” than what was known before. A second
Labour official added: “The latest revelations have put him beyond what most
people are willing to accept.”
One person who speaks to No. 10 regularly said: “There are people who have known
him for a long time who are very hurt and angry. He has upset people.
“He had a much reduced reservoir of support coming into this anyway, and the
question is — who is going to touch him now?”
Ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown — who brought Mandelson back into government in
2008 — issued a statement tearing into the “shocking” revelations. | Will
Oliver/EPA
A person who knows Mandelson well drew a distinction between the reaction to his
sacking in September, when some colleagues felt concern for Mandelson on a
“human level because of the very public nature of his sacking,” and the “shock
and real anger” at the revelations of the last few days.
“It felt like a kick in the gut to read it and has brought his behavior as
minister into question in a way no one could possibly have imagined,” they said.
Sullivan said: “People thought that he had been characteristically not as frank
as he could be with his relationship with Epstein … but I don’t think people had
clocked just quite how big the significance of those revelations [Monday] are.
“Any one of those, if it had come out at the time, would have brought the
government down. I was a very junior Spad in the last Labour government. [With]
Gordon Brown, you could hear the anger in his statement.”
“I think the potential ramifications of this not just for the Labour Party but
for politics and politicians in general could be understated. It is serious,”
Sullivan added.
The former diplomat quoted above added: “People are genuinely astonished at the
sort of stuff he told Epstein. He always had a reputation of being relatively
indiscreet, but some of that stuff, I mean, why Epstein? I don’t know why
Epstein seemed to have had such a grip on him.”
John McTernan, who served as a senior aide during the New Labour years, said:
“It turns out that Peter’s actions are those of an avaricious man — which makes
it really sad, because he did so much to make Labour electable, not once but
twice.”
WHERE DOES IT GO FROM HERE?
Britain’s opposition Conservative Party is likely to apply fresh pressure on
Wednesday by formally demanding that ministers release the details of
Mandelson’s vetting for the ambassador post.
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper revealed in September that Mandelson was not
subjected to full national security vetting until after his appointment had been
announced.
One government official said: “If there wasn’t any real vetting until after the
appointment, that could be very damaging in my view.”
Labour officials also smell danger in the fact that Gordon Brown asked the
government to investigate Mandelson’s communications on Sept. 10 — a day before
Starmer resolved to sack Mandelson as ambassador. The Labour Party has said
disciplinary action was underway against Mandelson before he resigned his party
membership on Sunday, but has not said when it began — days, weeks, or months
ago.
One former Labour official said: “The problem for the government as a whole and
the civil service is Gordon clearly clocked something had gone on, had some
concerns, and raised them last September, and it’s unclear exactly what has
happened to dig it out.”
No. 10 went nuclear in its response on Tuesday, saying the government was
investigating and had contacted the police. Starmer’s spokesperson said: “An
initial review of the documents released in relation to Jeffrey Epstein by the
U.S. Department of Justice has found that they contain likely market-sensitive
information surrounding the 2008 financial crash and official activities
thereafter to stabilize the economy.
“Only people operating in an official capacity had access to this information,
[with] strict handling conditions to ensure it was not available to anyone who
could potentially benefit from it financially. It appears these safeguards were
compromised.
“In light of this information, the Cabinet Office has referred this material to
the police.”
Starmer and McSweeney can maintain that they — like the rest of the press and
British public — knew nothing of the emails revealed this week when they
appointed Mandelson. Whether they can prevent the saga raising questions about
their judgment may be another matter.
BRUSSELS — The EU and U.K. must overcome historic gripes and “reset” their
relationship to be able to work together in an increasingly uncertain world, the
bloc’s top parliamentarian said.
European Parliament President Roberta Metsola used an address to the Spanish
senate on Tuesday to call for closer ties with the U.K. as London steps up
efforts to secure smoother access to European markets and funding projects,
after the country voted to leave the bloc in 2016.
“Ten years on from Brexit … and in a world that has changed so profoundly,
Europe and the U.K. need a new way of working together on trade, customs,
research, mobility and on security and defense,” Metsola said. “Today it is time
to exorcize the ghosts of the past.”
Metsola called for a “reset” in the partnership between Britain and the EU as
part of a policy of “realistic pragmatism anchored in values that will see all
of us move forward together.”
Her speech comes after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he intended to
try and ensure his country’s defense industries can benefit from the EU’s
flagship SAFE scheme — a €150 billion funding program designed to boost
procurement of military hardware.
That push has been far from smooth, with a meeting of EU governments on Monday
night failing to sign off U.K. access to SAFE, despite France — which has
consistently opposed non-EU countries taking part — supporting the British
inclusion.
Starmer has also signaled in recent days that he is seeking closer integration
with the EU’s single market. Brussels has so far been reluctant to reopen the
terms of the U.K.’s relations with the bloc just six years after it exited.
While those decisions lie with the remaining 27 EU member countries, rather than
the Parliament, Metsola’s intervention marks a shift in tone that could bolster
the British case for closer relations. In the context of increasingly tense
relations with the U.S., capitals are depending on cooperation with British
intelligence and military capabilities and in key industries.
Europe must take “the next steps towards a stronger European defense, boosting
our capabilities and cooperation, and working closely with our NATO allies so
that Europe can better protect its people,” Metsola said.
BRUSSELS — The EU is relaunching its elite recruitment competition after a
seven-year break in an effort to find a new generation of high-level
administrators to help manage the world’s second largest economy.
The European Commission, which last held the competition in 2019, organizes the
assessment to inject new blood into Brussels’ corridors of power. A big wage and
job security await those who pass the test.
“It’s a contract for life,” said András Baneth, managing partner of EU Training,
which prepares applicants for the process, and author of a book on how to pass.
“This is a great opportunity for predictable career advancement and, of course,
a salary and everything that goes with it.”
Successful applicants are eligible for roles at grade “AD-5,” which come with a
monthly pay packet of between €5,973 and €6,758, as well as the chance to
progress through the bureaucracy and take up influential roles in commissioners’
Cabinets — the elite teams of advisers weighing in on key policy areas.
The graduate scheme, aimed at generalists, will open on Thursday, according to
the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), and close on March 10. It is the
first time since 2019 that the contest has been held. The process includes
psychometric testing, an EU knowledge assessment and an essay submission for
those who pass the initial stages.
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has made it a priority to give
younger, harder-working staff a chance to climb the ladder in an institution
that has historically had a stiff hierarchy, Commission officials said.
“It’s very important to bring a younger talent pool with a different way of
thinking in,” said a senior official, granted anonymity to speak frankly.
“You’ll have a lot of certain levels retiring and you need to make sure the next
generation of public servants is coming through. Of course we need people who
understand the institution, but we also need people who understand the
technologies of the future from a different perspective.”
According to a spokesperson for the Commission, the “extended pause” over the
past seven years was due to a move to full online testing. The scrapping of an
assessment center stage means “the overall duration of the competitions of EPSO
has been shortened.”
SET FOR LIFE
“After entering the workforce four years ago, this is finally my first chance to
enter the [EU] institutions, which until now has seemed impossible,” said one
prospective applicant, granted anonymity to avoid harming their application.
“Everyone knows that once you pass the [competition], and get a job, you’re set
for life. Which is why literally all of my friends will take this opportunity.”
Many younger staff in the 33,000-strong Commission workforce currently serve in
relatively insecure roles on short-term contracts or as agency employees,
meaning they have fewer benefits, worse take-home pay and far less certainty
over their future. The executive has launched a review of its structure,
designed to improve its efficiency and cost-effectiveness, with concerns that
those who do not have official status could be negatively affected by a
restructure.
A second prospective applicant, working in the private sector, hit out at the
irregularity of the process. “I really hope it will be different this time to
give external people a chance, since at the moment the system favors candidates
already working at the institutions,” they said.
Baneth, the test expert, said that about 1,200 applicants will be directly
offered jobs from an applicant pool that could exceed 50,000. Others will be
added to a reserve list from which “only 30 percent will actually be offered a
job … this leads to a lot of negative feelings when someone goes through all
this and still they cannot be sure they get a job.”
BRUSSELS ― European governments and corporations are racing to reduce their
exposure to U.S. technology, military hardware and energy resources as
transatlantic relations sour.
For decades, the EU relied on NATO guarantees to ensure security in the bloc,
and on American technology to power its business. Donald Trump’s threats to take
over Greenland, and aggressive comments about Europe by members of his
administration, have given fresh impetus to European leaders’ call for
“independence.”
“If we want to be taken seriously again, we will have to learn the language of
power politics,” German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said last week.
From orders banning civil servants from using U.S.-based videoconferencing tools
to trade deals with countries like India to a push to diversify Europe’s energy
suppliers, efforts to minimize European dependence on the U.S. are gathering
pace. EU leaders warn that transatlantic relations are unlikely to return to the
pre-Trump status quo.
EU officials stress that such measures amount to “de-risking” Europe’s
relationship with the U.S., rather than “decoupling” — a term that implies a
clean break in economic and strategic ties. Until recently, both expressions
were mainly applied to European efforts to reduce dependence on China. Now, they
are coming up in relation to the U.S., Europe’s main trade partner and security
benefactor.
The decoupling drive is in its infancy. The U.S. remains by far the largest
trading partner for Europe, and it will take years for the bloc to wean itself
off American tech and military support, according to Jean-Luc Demarty, who was
in charge of the European Commission’s trade department under the body’s former
president, Jean-Claude Juncker.
Donald Trump’s threats to take over Greenland, and aggressive comments about
Europe by members of his administration, have given fresh impetus to European
leaders’ call for “independence.” | Kristian Tuxen Ladegaard Berg/NurPhoto via
Getty Images
“In terms of trade, they [the U.S.] represent a significant share of our
exports,” said Demarty. “So it’s a lot, but it’s not a matter of life and
death.”
The push to diversify away from the U.S. has seen Brussels strike trade deals
with the Mercosur bloc of Latin American countries, India and Indonesia in
recent months. The Commission also revamped its deal with Mexico, and revived
stalled negotiations with Australia.
DEFENDING EUROPE: FROM NATO TO THE EU
Since the continent emerged from the ashes of World War II, Europe has relied
for its security on NATO — which the U.S. contributes the bulk of funding to. At
a weekend retreat in Zagreb, Croatia, conservative European leaders including
Merz said it was time for the bloc to beef up its homegrown mutual-defense
clause, which binds EU countries to an agreement to defend any EU country that
comes under attack.
While it has existed since 2009, the EU’s Article 42.7 mutual defense clause was
rarely seen as necessary because NATO’s Article 5 served a similar purpose.
But Europe’s governments have started to doubt whether the U.S. really would
come to Europe’s rescue.
In Zagreb, the leaders embraced the EU’s new role as a security actor, tasking
two leaders, as yet unnamed, with rapidly cooking up plans to turn the EU clause
from words to an ironclad security guarantee.
“For decades, some countries said ‘We have NATO, why should we have parallel
structures?’” said a senior EU diplomat who was granted anonymity to talk about
confidential summit preparations. After Trump’s Greenland saber-rattling, “we
are faced with the necessity, we have to set up military command structures
within the EU.”
At a weekend retreat in Zagreb, Croatia, conservative European leaders including
Merz said it was time for the bloc to beef up its homegrown mutual-defense
clause, which binds EU countries to an agreement to defend any EU country that
comes under attack. | Marko Perkov/AFP via Getty Images
In comments to EU lawmakers last week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said
that anyone who believes Europe can defend itself without the U.S. should “keep
on dreaming.”
Europe remains heavily reliant on U.S. military capabilities, most notably in
its support for Ukraine’s fight against Russia. But some Europeans are now
openly talking about the price of reducing exposure to the U.S. — and saying
it’s manageable.
TECHNOLOGY: TEAMS OUT, VISIO IN
The mood shift is clearest when it comes to technology, where European reliance
on platforms such as X, Meta and Google has long troubled EU voters, as
evidenced by broad support for the bloc’s tech legislation.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s government is planning to ban officials from
using U.S.-based videoconferencing tools. Other countries like Germany are
contemplating similar moves.
“It’s very clear that Europe is having our independence moment,” EU tech czar
Henna Virkkunen told a POLITICO conference last week. “During the last year,
everybody has really realized how important it is that we are not dependent on
one country or one company when it comes to some very critical technologies.”
France is moving to ban public officials from using American platforms including
Google Meet, Zoom and Teams, a government spokesperson told POLITICO. Officials
will soon make the switch to Visio, a videoconferencing tool that runs on
infrastructure provided by French firm Outscale.
In the European Parliament, lawmakers are urging its president, Roberta Metsola,
to ditch U.S. software and hardware, as well as a U.S.-based travel booking
tool.
In Germany, politicians want a potential German or European substitute for
software made by U.S. data analysis firm Palantir. “Such dependencies on key
technologies are naturally a major problem,” Sebastian Fiedler, an SPD lawmaker
and expert on policing, told POLITICO.
Even in the Netherlands, among Europe’s more pro-American countries, there are
growing calls from lawmakers and voters to ring-fence sensitive technologies
from U.S. influence. Dutch lawmakers are reviewing a petition signed by 140,000
people calling on the state to block the acquisition of a state identity
verification tool by a U.S. company.
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in late January, German
entrepreneur Anna Zeiter announced the launch of a Europe-based social media
platform called W that could rival Elon Musk’s X, which has faced fines for
breaching the EU’s content moderation rules. W plans to host its data on
“European servers owned by European companies” and limits its investors to
Europeans, Zeiter told Euronews.
So far, Brussels has yet to codify any such moves into law. But upcoming
legislation on cloud and AI services are expected to send signals about the need
to Europeanize the bloc’s tech offerings.
ENERGY: TIME TO DIVERSIFY
On energy, the same trend is apparent.
The United States provides more than a quarter of the EU’s gas, a share set to
rise further as a full ban on Russian imports takes effect.
But EU officials warn about the risk of increasing Europe’s dependency on the
U.S. in yet another area. Trump’s claims on Greenland were a “clear wake-up
call” for the EU, showing that energy can no longer be seen in isolation from
geopolitical trends, EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen said last Wednesday.
The Greenland crisis reinforced concerns that the bloc risks “replacing one
dependency with another,” said Jørgensen, adding that as a result, Brussels is
stepping up efforts to diversify, deepening talks with alternative suppliers
including Canada, Qatar and North African countries such as Algeria.
FINANCE: MOVING TO EUROPEAN PAYMENTS
Payment systems are also drawing scrutiny, with lawmakers warning about
over-reliance on U.S. payment systems such as Mastercard and Visa.
The digital euro, a digital version of cash that the European Central Bank is
preparing to issue in 2029, aims to cut these dependencies and provide a
pan-European sovereign means of payment. “With the digital euro, Europeans would
remain in control of their money, their choices and their future,” ECB President
Christine Lagarde said last year.
In Germany, some politicians are sounding the alarm about 1,236 tons of gold
reserves that Germany keeps in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
“In a time of growing global uncertainty and under President Trump’s
unpredictable U.S. policy, it’s no longer acceptable” to have that much in gold
reserves in the U.S., Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, the German politician from
the liberal Free Democratic Party, who chairs the Parliament’s defense
committee, told Der Spiegel.
Several European countries are pushing the EU to privilege European
manufacturers when it comes to spending EU public money via “Buy European”
clauses.
Until a few years ago, countries like Poland, the Netherlands or the Baltic
states would never have agreed on such “Buy European” clauses. But even those
countries are now backing calls to prioritize purchases from EU-based companies.
MILITARY INVESTMENT: BOOSTING OWN CAPACITY
A €150 billion EU program to help countries boost their defense investments,
finalized in May of last year, states that no more than 35 percent of the
components in a given purchase, by cost, should originate from outside the EU
and partner states like Norway and Ukraine. The U.S. is not considered a partner
country under the scheme.
For now, European countries rely heavily on the U.S. for military enablers
including surveillance and reconnaissance, intelligence, strategic lift, missile
defense and space-based assets. But the powerful conservative umbrella group,
the European People Party, says these are precisely the areas where Europe needs
to ramp up its own capacities.
When EU leaders from the EPP agreed on their 2026 roadmap in Zagreb, they stated
that the “Buy European” principle should apply to an upcoming Commission
proposal on joint procurement.
The title of the EPP’s 2026 roadmap? “Time for independence.”
Camille Gijs, Jacopo Barigazzi, Mathieu Pollet, Giovanna Faggionato, Eliza
Gkritsi, Elena Giordano, Ben Munster and Sam Clark contributed reporting from
Brussels. James Angelos contributed reporting from Berlin.