BRUSSELS — European banks and other finance firms should decrease their reliance
on American tech companies for digital services, a top national supervisor has
said.
In an interview with POLITICO, Steven Maijoor, the Dutch central bank’s chair of
supervision, said the “small number of suppliers” providing digital services to
many European finance companies can pose a “concentration risk.”
“If one of those suppliers is not able to supply, you can have major operational
problems,” Maijoor said.
The intervention comes as Europe’s politicians and industries grapple with the
continent’s near-total dependence on U.S. technology for digital services
ranging from cloud computing to software. The dominance of American companies
has come into sharp focus following a decline in transatlantic relations under
U.S. President Donald Trump.
While the market for European tech services isn’t nearly as developed as in the
U.S. — making it difficult for banks to switch — the continent “should start to
try to develop this European environment” for financial stability and the sake
of its economic success, Maijoor said.
European banks being locked in to contracts with U.S. providers “will ultimately
also affect their competitiveness,” Maijoor said. Dutch supervisors recently
authored a report on the systemic risks posed by tech dependence in finance.
Dutch lender Amsterdam Trade Bank collapsed in 2023 after its parent company was
placed on the U.S. sanctions list and its American IT provider withdrew online
data storage services, in one of the sharpest examples of the impact on
companies that see their tech withdrawn.
Similarly a 2024 outage of American cybersecurity company CrowdStrike
highlighted the European finance sector’s vulnerabilities to operational risks
from tech providers, the EU’s banking watchdog said in a post-mortem on the
outage.
In his intervention, Maijoor pointed to an EU law governing the operational
reliability of banks — the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) — as one
factor that may be worsening the problem.
Those rules govern finance firms’ outsourcing of IT functions such as cloud
provision, and designate a list of “critical” tech service providers subject to
extra oversight, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft and
Oracle.
DORA, and other EU financial regulation, may be “inadvertently nudging financial
institutions towards the largest digital service suppliers,” which wouldn’t be
European, Maijoor said.
“If you simply look at quality, reliability, security … there’s a very big
chance that you will end up with the largest digital service suppliers from
outside Europe,” he said.
The bloc could reassess the regulatory approach to beat the risks, Maijoor said.
“DORA currently is an oversight approach, which is not as strong in terms of
requirements and enforcement options as regular supervision,” he said.
The Dutch supervisors are pushing for changes, writing that they are examining
whether financial regulation and supervision in the EU creates barriers to
choosing European IT providers, and that identified issues “may prompt policy
initiatives in the European context.”
They are asking EU governments and supervisors “to evaluate whether DORA
sufficiently enhances resilience to geopolitical risks and, if not, to consider
issuing further guidance,” adding they “see opportunities to strengthen DORA as
needed,” including through more enforcement and more explicit requirements
around managing geopolitical risks.
Europe could also set up a cloud watchdog across industries to mitigate the
risks of dependence on U.S. tech service providers, which are “also very
important for other parts of the economy like energy and telecoms,” Maijoor
said.
“Wouldn’t there be a case for supervision more generally of these hyperscalers,
cloud service providers, as they are so important for major parts of the
economy?”
The European Commission declined to respond.
Tag - Telecoms
Europe’s security does not depend solely on our physical borders and their
defense. It rests on something far less visible, and far more sensitive: the
digital networks that keep our societies, economies and democracies functioning
every second of the day.
> Without resilient networks, the daily workings of Europe would grind to a
> halt, and so too would any attempt to build meaningful defense readiness.
A recent study by Copenhagen Economics confirms that telecom operators have
become the first line of defense in Europe’s security architecture. Their
networks power essential services ranging from emergency communications and
cross-border healthcare to energy systems, financial markets, transport and,
increasingly, Europe’s defense capabilities. Without resilient networks, the
daily workings of Europe would grind to a halt, and so too would any attempt to
build meaningful defense readiness.
This reality forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: Europe cannot build
credible defense capabilities on top of an economically strained, structurally
fragmented telecom sector. Yet this is precisely the risk today.
A threat landscape outpacing Europe’s defenses
The challenges facing Europe are evolving faster than our political and
regulatory systems can respond. In 2023 alone, ENISA recorded 188 major
incidents, causing 1.7 billion lost user-hours, the equivalent of taking entire
cities offline. While operators have strengthened their systems and outage times
fell by more than half in 2024 compared with the previous year, despite a
growing number of incidents, the direction of travel remains clear: cyberattacks
are more sophisticated, supply chains more vulnerable and climate-related
physical disruptions more frequent. Hybrid threats increasingly target civilian
digital infrastructure as a way to weaken states. Telecom networks, once
considered as technical utilities, have become a strategic asset essential to
Europe’s stability.
> Europe cannot deploy cross-border defense capabilities without resilient,
> pan-European digital infrastructure. Nor can it guarantee NATO
> interoperability with 27 national markets, divergent rules and dozens of
> sub-scale operators unable to invest at continental scale.
Our allies recognize this. NATO recently encouraged members to spend up to 1.5
percent of their GDP on protecting critical infrastructure. Secretary General
Mark Rutte also urged investment in cyber defense, AI, and cloud technologies,
highlighting the military benefits of cloud scalability and edge computing – all
of which rely on high-quality, resilient networks. This is a clear political
signal that telecom security is not merely an operational matter but a
geopolitical priority.
The link between telecoms and defense is deeper than many realize. As also
explained in the recent Arel report, Much More than a Network, modern defense
capabilities rely largely on civilian telecom networks. Strong fiber backbones,
advanced 5G and future 6G systems, resilient cloud and edge computing, satellite
connectivity, and data centers form the nervous system of military logistics,
intelligence and surveillance. Europe cannot deploy cross-border defense
capabilities without resilient, pan-European digital infrastructure. Nor can it
guarantee NATO interoperability with 27 national markets, divergent rules and
dozens of sub-scale operators unable to invest at continental scale.
Fragmentation has become one of Europe’s greatest strategic vulnerabilities.
The reform Europe needs: An investment boost for digital networks
At the same time, Europe expects networks to become more resilient, more
redundant, less dependent on foreign technology and more capable of supporting
defense-grade applications. Security and resilience are not side tasks for
telecom operators, they are baked into everything they do. From procurement and
infrastructure design to daily operations, operators treat these efforts as core
principles shaping how networks are built, run and protected. Therefore, as the
Copenhagen Economics study shows, the level of protection Europe now requires
will demand substantial additional capital.
> It is unrealistic to expect world-class, defense-ready infrastructure to
> emerge from a model that has become structurally unsustainable.
This is the right ambition, but the economic model underpinning the sector does
not match these expectations. Due to fragmentation and over-regulation, Europe’s
telecom market invests less per capita than global peers, generates roughly half
the return on capital of operators in the United States and faces rising costs
linked to expanding security obligations. It is unrealistic to expect
world-class, defense-ready infrastructure to emerge from a model that has become
structurally unsustainable.
A shift in policy priorities is therefore essential. Europe must place
investment in security and resilience at the center of its political agenda.
Policy must allow this reality to be reflected in merger assessments, reduce
overlapping security rules and provide public support where the public interest
exceeds commercial considerations. This is not state aid; it is strategic social
responsibility.
Completing the single market for telecommunications is central to this agenda. A
fragmented market cannot produce the secure, interoperable, large-scale
solutions required for modern defense. The Digital Networks Act must simplify
and harmonize rules across the EU, supported by a streamlined governance that
distinguishes between domestic matters and cross-border strategic issues.
Spectrum policy must also move beyond national silos, allowing Europe to avoid
conflicts with NATO over key bands and enabling coherent next-generation
deployments.
Telecom policy nowadays is also defense policy. When we measure investment gaps
in digital network deployment, we still tend to measure simple access to 5G and
fiber. However, we should start considering that — if security, resilience and
defense-readiness are to be taken into account — the investment gap is much
higher that the €200 billion already estimated by the European Commission.
Europe’s strategic choice
The momentum for stronger European defense is real — but momentum fades if it is
not seized. If Europe fails to modernize and secure its telecom infrastructure
now, it risks entering the next decade with a weakened industrial base, chronic
underinvestment, dependence on non-EU technologies and networks unable to
support advanced defense applications. In that scenario, Europe’s democratic
resilience would erode in parallel with its economic competitiveness, leaving
the continent more exposed to geopolitical pressure and technological
dependency.
> If Europe fails to modernize and secure its telecom infrastructure now, it
> risks entering the next decade with a weakened industrial base, chronic
> underinvestment, dependence on non-EU technologies and networks unable to
> support advanced defense applications.
Europe still has time to change course and put telecoms at the center of its
agenda — not as a technical afterthought, but as a core pillar of its defense
strategy. The time for incremental steps has passed. Europe must choose to build
the network foundations of its security now or accept that its strategic
ambitions will remain permanently out of reach.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer
POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENT
* The sponsor is Connect Europe AISBL
* The ultimate controlling entity is Connect Europe AISBL
* The political advertisement is linked to advocacy on EU digital, telecom and
industrial policy, including initiatives such as the Digital Networks Act,
Digital Omnibus, and connectivity, cybersecurity, and defence frameworks
aimed at strengthening Europe’s digital competitiveness.
More information here.
The German government is set to get new powers to bar risky Chinese technology
suppliers from its critical infrastructure.
Lawmakers in the federal Bundestag parliament on Thursday approved legislation
that would give new tools to the Interior Ministry to ban the use of components
from specific manufacturers in critical sectors over cybersecurity risks. The
measures resemble what European countries have done in the telecom sector, but
the new German bill applies to a much wider range of sectors, including energy,
transport and health care.
The law comes as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday signaled a tougher
stance against Chinese tech giant Huawei, telling a business conference in
Berlin that he “won’t allow any components from China in the 6G network.” Merz
is set to discuss the issue at a major digital sovereignty summit co-hosted by
Germany and France next week.
The fresh scrutiny for supply chain security in the EU’s largest economy — a
manufacturing powerhouse with a complex relationship with China — comes at a
time when the European Union is considering how best to tackle cyber risks in
supply chains dominated by Chinese firms.
Governments are looking beyond the telecom sector, pushing for action in areas
such as solar power and connected cars. European cybersecurity officials are
finalizing an ICT Supply Chain Toolbox to help governments mitigate the risks,
and the European Commission is preparing an overhaul of its Cybersecurity Act to
address the issue, expected in January.
The German legislation implements the EU’s NIS2 Directive, a critical
infrastructure cybersecurity law. The Bundesrat, Germany’s upper legislative
chamber, still has to sign off on the bill, which is expected next Friday.
The key question is whether Germany is willing to use its powers, said Noah
Barkin, a senior advisor at Rhodium Group, a think tank. On telecoms, “this
helps lay the groundwork for pushing Huawei out of the 5G network, but it
doesn’t guarantee that the political will will be there to take that decision,”
he said.
The Interior Ministry could already block telecom operators from using
particular components under an existing German IT security law. The law’s 2021
revision was widely seen as an attempt to get Chinese firms like Huawei and ZTE
out of telecom network due to fears of cybersecurity and security risks. The
Interior Ministry intervened in 2024, but it has never formally blocked the use
of specific components under that law.
For its new cyber law, the government originally proposed to extend the measures
applying to the telecom industry to the electricity sector as well. But
parliament’s version now applies to all critical sectors, which under the EU’s
NIS2 law includes areas such as transport, health care and digital
infrastructure.
German center-left lawmaker Johannes Schätzl, the digital policy spokesperson
for the SPD, said this is a “logical step, because cyber and hybrid threats do
not stop at sectoral boundaries.”
The Interior Ministry will be required to consult with other arms of government
when considering bans or blocks of certain suppliers, the bill said. In the
past, some ministries like the digital and economy departments have been more
reluctant to banning Chinese components, in part due to fears of economic
retaliation from Beijing.
Industry, too, could resist the new measures. German technology trade
association Bitkom on Thursday said that the new rules could be unpredictable
and therefore “detrimental.”
ROME — The conservative think tank behind Donald Trump’s Project 2025 roadmap is
looking for new friends across the Atlantic.
The Heritage Foundation, the intellectual engine behind the 922-page blueprint
that has become the key policy manual for Trump’s second term, is partnering
with a constellation of European nationalist far-right movements to export its
playbook for countering progressive policies.
That included a conference in late October at the frescoed former home of late
premier Silvio Berlusconi in Rome focused on Europe’s demographic crisis and the
idea that falling birthrates pose a threat to Western civilization. Speakers
included Roger Severino, Heritage’s vice president of domestic policy and the
architect of the group’s campaign to roll back abortion access in the U.S., as
well as Italy’s pro-life family minister Eugenia Roccella, the deputy speaker of
the Senate, and members of Italian right-wing think tanks.
Severino and the Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, have also been
speaking guests at summits and assemblies of far-right groups such as Patriots
for Europe, which includes Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National and Italy’s
League, under a Make Europe Great Again banner.
Meanwhile Heritage representatives have held private meetings in Washington and
Brussels with lawmakers from far-right parties in Hungary, Czechia, Spain,
France and Germany. Just in the past 12 months, the group held seven meetings
with members of the European Parliament, compared to just one in the five years
prior, according to Parliament records. And they’ve had additional meetings with
MEPs that weren’t formally reported, including with three members from Italian
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party.
Severino told POLITICO that meetings with the European right serve to exchange
ideas. But the meetings signal more than pleasantries. For European politicians,
they’re a way to get access to people in Trump’s orbit. For Heritage, they’re a
way to extend influence beyond Washington and achieve its ideological goals,
which under Roberts have grown increasingly aligned with Trump’s MAGA approach.
Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow at Heritage, said he meets with conservative
parties to share experience in dealing with common challenges — “comparing
notes, that kind of thing.” He said his interlocutors are “very interested” in
policies on abortion, gender theory, defense and China, adding that parts of
Project 2025 such as a section he wrote on defunding public broadcasters, are
“very transferable” to Europe.
The foundation has been active in Europe for years, he points out, but demand
has increased since Trump’s return to office. European right-wing leaders,
Gonzalez said, “see Trump and what he is doing and say, ‘I want to get me some
of that.’”
BETTER THE SECOND TIME
It’s not the first time MAGA has attempted to galvanize the European right.
Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon unsuccessfully tried to unite populist
nationalist parties under the Movement think tank in 2019, hamstrung by a lack
of buy-in from the parties themselves.
Some observers are doubtful this renewed push will go differently. “I’m
skeptical that it will amount to much,” said EJ Fagan, an associate politics
professor at the University of Illinois and author of The Thinkers, a book on
partisan think tanks. “The European right have their own resources that produce
policies, so there’s not a lot Heritage can provide to European parties.”
That is especially an issue, Fagan noted, when it comes to finessing
legislation, since Heritage doesn’t have a deep bench of “people who have a fine
understanding of laws and treaties” in Europe.
But the Heritage Foundation’s European mission comes as far-right groups gain
ground across Europe by tapping public frustration over issues such as
immigration, climate policy and sovereignty and pushing policies that are
similar to those laid out in the group’s Project 2025 agenda.
Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, have also been speaking guests
at summits and assemblies of far-right groups such as Patriots for Europe. | Jim
Lo Scalzo/EPA
In Italy, two MPs have proposed legislation granting fetal personhood, which
would make abortion impossible. The regional government in Lazio is preparing to
approve a law that would guarantee protection of the fetus “from conception,”
echoing a similar push in the US. And Rocella, Meloni’s family minister who
appeared last month with Heritage’s Severino, is attempting to block a regional
law banning conscientious objectors from roles in clinics providing abortions.
It’s not just reproductive rights. Meloni’s government has pulled out of a
memorandum of understanding on the Belt and Road Initiative, the Chinese
government’s ambitious program that aims to finance over $1 trillion in
infrastructure investments. It effectively blocked Chinese telecoms giant Huawei
from being a part in telecommunications development.
Lucio Malan, an MP in Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party and a panelist at two
conferences organized with the Heritage Foundation, attempted to reverse a ban
on homophobic and sexist advertisements — though he told POLITICO he took part
in the events on the invitation of the center-right FareFuturo think tank, which
co-organized the events with Heritage.
Heritage and its allies in the Trump administration have everything to gain from
stronger nationalist parties in Europe, which are also pushing for delays in
climate and agriculture regulations and sided with the US and Big Tech on
digital regulation. Earlier this year, Heritage hosted the presentation of
proposals by two far-right European think tanks, Hungary’s Mathias Corvinus
Collegium (MCC) and Poland’s Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture, to overhaul
and hollow out the EU, undermining the commission and the European Court of
Justice.
And Heritage’s activity in Europe comes as the organization faces a swirl of
controversy back home after Roberts sided with right-wing political commentator
Tucker Carlson over criticism for interviewing a white nationalist. The incident
triggered an open revolt against Roberts, who subsequently apologized.
The unexpectedly swift and wide-ranging implementation of Project 2025 in the
U.S. has boosted Heritage’s credentials in Europe, said Kenneth Haar of
Corporate Europe Observatory, a non-profit that monitors lobbying in the EU.
“Trump’s wholesale adoption of their agenda has given them unparalleled status,”
he said. Now, Haar added, Heritage “is not just a think tank from the U.S., it
is a representative of the MAGA coalition. It is not an exaggeration to say they
are carrying out foreign policy on behalf of the president.”
But the Heritage Foundation’s European mission comes as far-right groups gain
ground across Europe by tapping public frustration over issues such as
immigration, climate policy and sovereignty and pushing policies that are
similar to those laid out in the group’s Project 2025 agenda. | Shawn Thew/EPA
For Heritage, there’s good reason to focus on Europe in particular: It has
become a focal point for the group’s donors and activists in the U.S., who fret
about perceived Islamicization and leftist politics on the continent.
“We have an existential interest in having Europe be sovereign and free and
strong,” Gonzalez told POLITICO.
A RALLYING POINT
Historically, Europe’s right has struggled to cooperate, with different factions
representing conflicting national interests. But the machinery underpinning
Trump’s reelection, and his ability to move national policy in European
capitals, has shifted those dynamics, making Heritage “a factor in uniting the
European right,” Haar said.
“MAGA has become a rallying point, the European right is meeting more
frequently,” he added. Trump’s support for their policies also gives them more
“clout” in Europe, he said, as Europe’s leaders seek favor from Trump and his
allies across a range of issues, including tariffs.
Transparency activists said that they’re seeing a notable uptick in activity
that suggests Heritage is gaining traction beyond symposiums and events.
Raphaël Kergueno, Senior Policy Officer at Transparency International, a NGO
advocating against undue political influence, said the group’s activities —
including those undeclared meetings with MEPs, which may put those members in
breach of the European Parliament’s code of conduct — underscores the weakness
of European rules on lobbying and advocacy.
Kenneth Haar added, Heritage “is not just a think tank from the U.S., it is a
representative of the MAGA coalition. It is not an exaggeration to say they are
carrying out foreign policy on behalf of the president.” | Shawn Thew/EPA
“The Heritage Foundation has pushed blatantly anti-democratic projects, and is
now free to court MEPs without disclosing its goals or funding,” he said. “If
the EU does not clean up its act, it will allow hostile actors to import
authoritarianism through the backdoor.”
But Nicola Procaccini, an MEP in Meloni’s party who has held several meetings
with Heritage, dismissed the idea that Heritage presents a danger to the rule of
law or to European politics. He said he has not read Project 2025, and pointed
to the group’s long history as an economic policy powerhouse — though that has
changed in the Trump era, as the group’s new head Roberts has pivoted closer to
Trump.
Nevertheless, he said, “You can share or not share their views … but Heritage is
certainly an authoritative voice.”
BRUSSELS — Lawmakers in the European Parliament’s legal affairs committee have
voted to go ahead and sue the European Commission for axing a proposal to
regulate patent licensing.
The JURI committee on Tuesday voted in favor of referring the Commission to the
Court of Justice of the European Union for breaching EU law by withdrawing a
proposal to regulate standard essential patents.
The patents, for 4G and 5G networks used in mobile phones and connected cars,
have been at the center of a long-running battle between the companies that own
them and those that use them. European lawmakers have supported efforts to
resolve the fight — and some accuse the EU executive of attacking democracy by
killing off the initiative.
President Roberta Metsola now needs to mandate the Parliament’s legal service to
draft and file a case by Nov. 14, a Parliament official said, citing rules of
procedure. If she intends to depart from JURI’s conclusions, she could also
bring it to the Conference of Presidents or, in an unlikely scenario, submit it
to a plenary vote, they added.
Fourteen MEPs voted in favor of the action, against eight who opposed it, the
official said. The vote was held behind closed doors.
The motion was spearheaded by German Social Democrat René Repasi, coordinator
for the Committee on Legal Affairs and standing rapporteur for disputes
involving the Parliament.
“With today’s vote, we send a clear message: we will not stand by when the
Commission oversteps its mandate,” Repasi said in an emailed statement following
the vote.
“The Commission’s right to withdraw a proposal, as was conducted with the
Standard-Essential Patents (SEP) proposal, cannot be used as a political
instrument to short-circuit Parliament’s work or to enforce a deregulation
agenda from above. This is not in line with how the democratic processes in the
European Union are meant to function.”
Members of the European People’s Party, the center-right party allied to
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, were instructed to vote against
taking legal action.
“Today’s vote reflects Parliament’s concern about the balance of powers between
EU institutions, but we must be clear: This legal action will not bring back the
withdrawn legislative proposal,” Adrián Vázquez Lázara, the EPP’s lead on the
issue, told POLITICO.
While he acknowledged that the withdrawal of the SEP bill raised some question
marks, Vázquez Lázara said that legal action was not the right solution.
“What can be questioned, however, is the wording and justification used in this
specific withdrawal, which raises legitimate concerns about institutional
transparency and communication,” Vázquez Lázara said. “Those Members who wish to
see the proposal revived should seek political and legislative avenues to
achieve that goal, rather than resorting to institutional confrontation.”
Patent implementers, which historically supported the regulation and range from
carmakers to Big Tech companies and SMEs, cheered the move.
“There is still hope for democracy and fairness in the EU legislature,” said
Evelina Kurgonaite of the Fair Standards Alliance, which represents the patent
users. “We thank MEP [Marion] Walsmann and other JURI members for their
leadership in fighting for a fair chance at innovation for businesses in
Europe, especially SMEs.”
The Commission declined to comment.
MILAN — Nothing about the sand-colored façade of the palazzo tucked behind
Milan’s Duomo cathedral suggested that inside it a team of computer engineers
were building a database to gather private and damaging information about
Italy’s political elite — and use it to try to control them.
The platform, called Beyond, pulled together hundreds of thousands of records
from state databases — including flagged financial transactions and criminal
investigations — to create detailed profiles on politicians, business leaders
and other prominent figures.
Police wiretaps recorded someone they identified as Samuele Calamucci, allegedly
the technical mastermind of the group, boasting that the dossiers gave them the
power to “screw over all of Italy.”
The operation collapsed in fall 2024, when a two-year investigation culminated
in the arrests of four people, with a further 60 questioned. The alleged
ringleaders have denied ever directly accessing state databases, while
lower-level operatives maintain they only conducted open-source searches and
believed their actions were legal. Police files indicate that key suspects
claimed they were operating with the tacit approval of the Italian state.
After months of questioning and plea bargaining, 15 of the accused are set to
enter their pleas at the first court hearing in October.
The disclosures were shocking, not only because of the confidentiality of the
data but also the high-profile nature of the targets, which included former
Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and Ignazio La Russa, co-founder of the ruling
Brothers of Italy party and president of the Senate.
The scandal underscores a novel reality: that in the digital era, privacy is a
relic. While dossiers and kompromat have long been tools of political warfare,
hackers today, commanded by the highest bidder, can access information to
exploit decision-makers’ weaknesses — from private indiscretions to financial
vulnerabilities. The result is a political and business class highly exposed to
external pressures, heightening fears about the resilience of democratic
institutions in an era where data is both power and liability.
POLITICO obtained thousands of pages of police wiretap transcripts and arrest
warrants and spoke with alleged perpetrators, their victims and officials
investigating the scheme. Together, the documents and interviews reveal an
intricate plot to build a database filled with confidential and compromising
data — and a business plan to exploit it for both legal and illegal means.
On the surface, the group presented itself as a corporate intelligence firm,
courting high-profile clients by claiming expertise in resolving complex risk
management issues such as commercial fraud, corruption and infiltration by
organized crime.
Banca Mediolanum, said it had paid “€3,000 to Equalize to gather more public
information regarding a company that could have been the subject of a potential
deal, managed by our investment bank.” | Diego Puletto/Getty Images
Prosecutors accuse the gang of compiling damaging dossiers by illegally
accessing phones, computers and state databases containing information ranging
from tax records to criminal convictions. The data could be used to pressure and
threaten victims or fed to journalists to discredit them.
The alleged perpetrators include a former star police investigator, the top
manager of Milan’s trade fair complex and several cybersecurity experts
prominent in Italy’s tech scene. All have denied wrongdoing.
SUPERCOP TURNED SUPERCROOK
When the gang first drew the attention of investigators in the summer of 2022,
it was almost by accident.
Police were tracking a northern Italian gangster when he arranged a meeting with
retired police inspector Carmine Gallo at a coffee bar in downtown Milan. Gallo,
a veteran in the fight against organized crime, was a familiar face in Italy’s
law enforcement circles. The meeting raised suspicions, and authorities put
Gallo under surveillance — and inadvertently uncovered the gang’s wider
operations.
Gallo, who died in March 2025, was a towering figure in Italian law enforcement.
He helped solve high-profile cases such as the 1995 murder of Maurizio Gucci —
carried out by the fashion mogul’s ex-wife Patrizia Reggiani and her clairvoyant
— and the 1997 kidnapping of Milanese businesswoman Alessandra Sgarella by the
‘ndrangheta organized crime syndicate.
Yet Gallo’s career was not without controversy. Over four decades, he cultivated
ties to organized crime networks and faced repeated investigations for
overstepping legal boundaries. He ultimately received a two-year suspended
sentence for sharing official secrets and assisting criminals.
When he retired from the force in 2018, Gallo illegally carted off investigative
material such as transcripts of interviews with moles, mafia family trees and
photofits, prosecutors’ documents show. His modus operandi was to tell municipal
employees to “get a coffee and come back in half an hour” while he photographed
documents, he boasted in wiretaps.
Still, Gallo’s work ethic remained relentless. In 2019, he co-founded Equalize —
the IT company that hosted the Beyond database — with his business partner
Enrico Pazzali, presenting the firm as a corporate risk intelligence company.
Gallo’s years as a police officer gave him a unique advantage: He could leverage
relationships with former colleagues in law enforcement and intelligence to get
them to carry out illegal searches on his behalf. Some of the information he
obtained was then repackaged as reputational dossiers for clients, commanding
fees of up to €15,000.
Gallo also cashed in his influence for favors, such as procuring passports for
friends and acquaintances. Investigators recorded conversations in which he
bragged of sourcing a passport for a convicted mafioso under investigation for
kidnapping, who planned to flee to the United Arab Emirates.
The supercop-turned-supercriminal claimed that Equalize had a full overview of
Italian criminal operations, extending even to countries like Australia and
Vietnam.
When investigators raided the group’s headquarters, they found thousands of
files and dossiers spanning decades of Italian criminal and political history.
The hackers even claimed to have — as part of what they called their “infinite
archive” — video evidence of the late Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s
so-called bunga bunga parties, which investigators called “a blackmail tool of
the highest value.”
Enrico Pazzali cultivated close ties to right-wing politicians, including
Attilio Fontana, president of the Lombardy region, and maintained a close
association with high-level intelligence officials. | Alessandro Bremec/Getty
Images
Gallo’s sudden death of a heart attack six months into the investigation stirred
unease among prosecutors. They noted that while an initial autopsy found no
signs of trauma or injection, the absence of such evidence does not necessarily
rule out interference. Investigators have ordered toxicology tests.
‘HANDSOME UNCLE’
Gallo’s collaborator Pazzalli, a well-known businessman who headed Milan’s
prestigious Fondazione Fiera Milano, the country’s largest exhibition center,
was Equalize’s alleged frontman.
Pazzali, through his lawyer, declined to comment to POLITICO about the
allegations.
The Fiera, a magnet for money and power, made Pazzali a heavy hitter in Milanese
circles. Having built a successful career across IT, energy and other sectors,
and boasting a full head of steely gray hair, he was known to some by the
nickname “Zio Bello,” or handsome uncle.
Pazzali cultivated close ties to right-wing politicians, including Attilio
Fontana, president of the Lombardy region, and maintained a close association
with high-level intelligence officials. He would meet clients in a
chauffeur-driven black Tesla X, complete with a blue flashing light on the roof
— the kind typically reserved for high-ranking officials.
Since 2019, Pazzali held a 95 percent stake in Equalize. If Gallo’s role was
sourcing confidential information, Pazzali’s was winning high-profile clients,
the prosecutors allege. Leveraging his reputation and political connections, he
helped secure business from banks, industrial conglomerates, multinationals, and
international law firms, including pasta giant Barilla, the Italian subsidiary
of Heineken, and energy powerhouse Eni.
Documents show that Eni paid Equalize €377,000. Roberto Albini, a spokesperson
for the energy giant, told POLITICO that the firm had commissioned Equalize “to
support its strategy and defense in the context of several criminal and civil
cases.” He added that Eni was not aware of any illegal activity by the company.
Marlous den Bieman, corporate communications manager for Heineken, said the
brewer had “ceased all collaboration with Equalize and is actively cooperating
with authorities in their investigation of the company’s practices.”
Barilla declined to comment.
Italy’s third-largest bank, Banca Mediolanum, said it had paid “€3,000 to
Equalize to gather more public information regarding a company that could have
been the subject of a potential deal, managed by our investment bank.” The bank
added, “Of course we were not aware that Equalize was in general conducting its
business also through the adoption of illicit procedures.”
The group’s reach extended beyond Italy. In February 2023, it was hired by
Israeli state intelligence agents in a €1 million operation to trace the
financial flows from the accounts of wealthy individuals to the Russian
mercenary network Wagner. In exchange, the Israelis promised to hand over
intelligence on the illicit trafficking of Iranian gas through Italy — a
commodity that, they suggested, might be of interest to Equalize’s client, the
energy giant Eni.
Equalize rapidly grew into a formidable private investigation operation. Police
reports noted that Pazzali recognized data as “a weapon for enormous economic
and reputational gains,” adding, “Equalize’s raison d’être is to provide …
Pazzali with information and dossiers to be used for the achievement of his
political and economic aims.”
During the 2023 election campaign for the presidency of the Lombardy region,
Pazzali ordered dossiers on close affiliates of former mayor of Milan, Letizia
Moratti, who was challenging his preferred candidate, the far-right Fontana.
Prime Minister Matteo Renzi warned of a deeper political risk associated with
the gang. | Vincenzo Nuzzolese/Getty Images
A spokesman for Fontana called the allegation “science-fiction” and said
“nothing was offered to the president of the region, he did not ask for
anything, and he certainly did not pay anything.”
In 2022, Pazzali was in the running to manage Italy’s 2026 Winter Olympics as
chief executive. Wiretaps suggested he ordered a dossier on his competitor,
football club AC Milan’s Chairman Paolo Scaroni, but found nothing on him.
Business was booming, but Pazzali and Gallo were thinking ahead. They had become
reliant on cops willing to leak information, and those officers could be spooked
— or caught in the act. That was a vulnerability.
They started to envisage a more sophisticated operation: a platform that
collated all the data the group had in its possession and could generate the
prized dossiers with the click of a button, erasing the need for bribes and
cutting manpower costs — a repository of high-level secrets that, once
operational, would give Pazzali, Gallo, and their team unprecedented power in
Italy.
Pazzali declined to comment on the investigation. He is due to plead before a
judge at a preliminary hearing in October.
‘THE PROFESSOR’ AND THE BOYS
Enter Samuele Calamucci, the coding brain of the operation.
Calamucci is from a small town just outside Milan, and before he began his
career in cybersecurity, he was involved in stonemasonry.
Unlike his partners Gallo and Pazzali, Calamucci wasn’t a known face in the city
— and he had worked hard to keep it that way. He ran his own private
investigation firm, Mercury Advisor, from the same offices as Equalize, handling
the company’s IT operations as an outside contractor.
Calamucci knew his way around Italian government IT systems, too. In wiretapped
conversations, he claimed to have helped build the digital infrastructure for
Italy’s National Cybersecurity Agency and to have worked for the secret
services’ Department of Information for Security.
Known within the gang as “the professor,” Calamucci’s role was to recruit and
manage a team of 30 to 40 programmers he called the ragazzi — the boys.
With his best recruits he began to build Beyond in 2022, the platform designed
to be the digital equivalent of an all-seeing eye.
To populate it, Calamucci and his team purchased data from the dark web,
exploited access through government IT maintenance contracts and siphoned
intelligence from state databases whenever they could, prosecutors said.
Beyond gave Pazzali, Gallo, and their gang a treasure trove of compromising
information on political and business figures in a searchable platform. Wiretaps
indicated the plan was to sell access via subscription to select clients,
including international law firm Dentons and some of the Big Four consultancies
like Deloitte, KPMG, and EY. | Aleksander Kalka/Getty Images
In one police-recorded conversation, Calamucci boasted of a hard drive holding
800,000 dossiers. Through his lawyer, Calamucci declined to comment.
“We all thought the requested reports served the good of the country,” said one
of the hackers, granted anonymity to speak freely. “Ninety percent of the
reports carried out were about energy projects, which required open-source
criminal records or membership in mafia syndicates, given that a large portion
concerned the South.” Only 5 percent of the jobs they carried out were for
individuals to conduct an analysis of enemies or competitors, he added.
The hackers were also “not allowed to know” who was coming into Equalize’s
office from the outside. Meetings were held behind closed doors in Gallo’s
office or in conference rooms, the hacker told POLITICO, explaining that the
analysts were unaware of the company’s dynamics and the people it associated
with.
Beyond gave Pazzali, Gallo, and their gang a treasure trove of compromising
information on political and business figures in a searchable platform. Wiretaps
indicated the plan was to sell access via subscription to select clients,
including international law firm Dentons and some of the Big Four consultancies
like Deloitte, KPMG, and EY.
Dentons declined to comment. Deloitte and EY did not respond to a request for
comment. Audee Van Winkel, senior communication officer for KPMG in Belgium,
where one of the alleged gang members worked, said the consultancy did not have
any knowledge or records of KPMG in Belgium working with the platform.
‘INTELLIGENCE MERCENARIES’
In Italy’s sprawling private investigation scene, Equalize was a relative
newcomer. But Gallo, Pazzali and their associates had something going for them:
They were well-connected.
One alleged member of the organization, Gabriele Pegoraro, had worked as an
external cybersecurity expert for intelligence services and had previously made
headlines as the IT genius who helped capture a fugitive terrorist.
Pegoraro said he “carried out only lawful operations using publicly available
sources” and “was in the dark about how the information was used.”
According to wiretaps, Calamucci and Gallo had worked with several intelligence
agents to provide surveillance to protect criminal informants.
On one occasion, Calamucci explained to a subordinate that the relationship with
the secret services “was essential” to continue running Equalize undisturbed.
“We are mercenaries for [Italian] intelligence,” he was heard saying by police
listening in on a meeting with foreign agents at his office.
The services also helped with data searches for the group and created a mask of
cover for the gang, prosecutors believe. A hacker proudly claimed that Equalize
had even received computers handed down from Italy’s foreign intelligence
agency, while law enforcement watched from bugs planted in the ceiling.
THE PROSECUTION
In October 2024, the music stopped.
Prosecutors placed four of the alleged gang members, including Gallo and
Calamucci, under house arrest and another 60 people under investigation. They
brought forward charges including conspiracy to hack, corruption, illegal
accessing of data and the violation of official secrets.
Franco Gabrielli, a former director of Italy’s civil intelligence services,
warned that even the toughest of sentences are unlikely to put an end to the
practice. | Alessandro Bremec/Getty Images
“Just as the Stasi destroyed the lives of so many people using a mixture of
fabricated and collected information, so did these guys,” said Leonida Reitano,
an Italian open-source investigator who studied the case. “They collected
sensitive information, including medical reports, and used it to compromise
their targets.”
News of what the gang had done dropped like a bombshell on Italy’s political
class. Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani told reporters at the time that the
affair was “unacceptable,” while Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi warned the
parliament that the hackers were “altering the rules of democracy.”
The Equalize scandal “is not only the most serious in the history of the Italian
Republic but represents a real and actual attack on democracy,” said Angelo
Bonelli, MP and member of the opposition Green Europe.
Prime Minister Renzi warned of a deeper political risk associated with the gang.
“It is clear that Equalize are very close to the leaders of the right-wing
parties, and intended to build a powerful organization, although it is not yet
certain how deep an impact they had,” he told POLITICO. Renzi is seeking damages
as a civil plaintiff in the eventual criminal trial.
Equalize was liquidated in March, and some of the alleged hackers have since
taken on legitimate roles within the cybersecurity sector.
There are many unresolved questions around the case. Investigators and observers
are still trying to determine the full extent of Equalize’s ties to Italian
intelligence agencies, and whether any clients were aware of or complicit in the
methods used to compile sensitive dossiers. Interviews with intelligence
officials conducted during the investigation were never transcribed, and
testimony given to a parliamentary committee remains classified. Police
documents are heavily redacted, leaving the identities of key figures and the
full scope of the operation unclear.
While Equalize is unprecedented in its scale, efforts to collect information on
political opponents have “become an Italian tradition,” said the political
historian Giovanni Orsina. Spying and political chicanery during and after the
Cold War has damaged democracy and undermined trust in public institutions, made
worse by a lethargic justice system that can take years if not decades to
deliver justice.
“It adds to the perception that Italy is a country in which you can never find
the truth,” Orsina said.
Franco Gabrielli, a former director of Italy’s civil intelligence services,
warned that even the toughest of sentences are unlikely to put an end to the
practice. “It just increases the costs, because if I risk more, I charge more,”
he said.
“We must reduce the damage, put in place procedures, mechanisms,” he added.
“But, unfortunately, all over the world, even where people earn more there are
always black sheep, people who are corrupted. It’s human nature.”
BRUSSELS — First it was telecom snooping. Now Europe is growing worried that
Huawei could turn the lights off.
The Chinese tech giant is at the heart of a brewing storm over the security of
Europe’s energy grids. Lawmakers are writing to the European Commission to urge
it to “restrict high-risk vendors” from solar energy systems, in a letter seen
by POLITICO. Such restrictions would target Huawei first and foremost, as the
dominant Chinese supplier of critical parts of these systems.
The fears center around solar panel inverters, a piece of technology that turns
solar panels’ electricity into current that flows into the grid. China is a
dominant supplier of these inverters, and Huawei is its biggest player. Because
the inverters are hooked up to the internet, security experts warn the inverters
could be tampered with or shut down through remote access, potentially causing
dangerous surges or drops in electricity in Europe’s networks.
The warnings come as European governments have woken up to the risks of being
reliant on other regions for critical services — from Russian gas to Chinese
critical raw materials and American digital services. The bloc is in a stand-off
with Beijing over trade in raw materials, and has faced months of pressure from
Washington on how Brussels regulates U.S. tech giants.
Cybersecurity authorities are close to finalizing work on a new “toolbox” to
de-risk tech supply chains, with solar panels among its key target sectors,
alongside connected cars and smart cameras.
Two members of the European Parliament, Dutch liberal Bart Groothuis and Slovak
center-right lawmaker Miriam Lexmann, drafted a letter warning the European
Commission of the risks. “We urge you to propose immediate and binding measures
to restrict high-risk vendors from our critical infrastructure,” the two wrote.
The members had gathered the support of a dozen colleagues by Wednesday and are
canvassing for more to join the initiative before sending the letter mid next
week.
According to research by trade body SolarPower Europe, Chinese firms control
approximately 65 percent of the total installed power in the solar sector. The
largest company in the European market is Huawei, a tech giant that is
considered a high-risk vendor of telecom equipment. The second-largest firm is
Sungrow, which is also Chinese, and controls about half the amount of solar
power as Huawei.
Huawei’s market power recently allowed it to make its way back into SolarPower
Europe, the solar sector’s most prominent lobby association in Brussels, despite
an ongoing Belgian bribery investigation focused on the firm’s lobbying
activities in Brussels that saw it banned from meeting with European Commission
and Parliament officials.
Security hawks are now upping the ante. Cybersecurity experts and European
manufacturers say the Chinese conglomerate and its peers could hack into
Europe’s power grid.
“They can disable safety parameters. They can set it on fire,” Erika Langerová,
a cybersecurity researcher at the Czech Technical University in Prague, said in
a media briefing hosted by the U.S. Mission to the EU in September.
Even switching solar installation off and on again could disrupt energy supply,
Langerová said. “When you do it on one installation, it’s not a problem, but
then you do it on thousands of installations it becomes a problem because the …
compound effect of these sudden changes in the operation of the device can
destabilize the power grid.”
Surges in electricity supply can trigger wider blackouts, as seen in Spain and
Portugal in April. | Matias Chiofalo/Europa Press via Getty Images
Surges in electricity supply can trigger wider blackouts, as seen in Spain and
Portugal in April.
Some governments have already taken further measures. Last November, Lithuania
imposed a ban on remote access by Chinese firms to renewable energy
installations above 100 kilowatts, effectively stopping the use of Chinese
inverters. In September, the Czech Republic issued a warning on the threat posed
by Chinese remote access via components including solar inverters. And in
Germany, security officials already in 2023 told lawmakers that an “energy
management component” from Huawei had them on alert, leading to a government
probe of the firm’s equipment.
CHINESE CONTROL, EU RESPONSE
The arguments leveled against Chinese manufacturers of solar inverters echo
those heard from security experts in previous years, in debates on whether or
not to block companies like video-sharing app TikTok, airport scanner maker
Nuctech and — yes — Huawei’s 5G network equipment.
Distrust of Chinese technology has skyrocketed. Under President Xi Jinping, the
Beijing government has rolled out regulations forcing Chinese companies to
cooperate with security services’ requests to share data and flag
vulnerabilities in their software. It has led to Western concerns that it opens
the door to surveillance and snooping.
One of the most direct threats involves remote management from China of products
embedded in European critical infrastructure. Manufacturers have remote access
to install updates and maintenance.
Europe has also grown heavily reliant on Chinese tech suppliers, particularly
when it comes to renewable energy, which is powering an increasing proportion of
European energy. Domestic manufacturers of solar panels have enough supply to
fill the gap that any EU action to restrict Chinese inverters would create,
Langerová said. But Europe does not yet have enough battery or wind
manufacturers — two clean energy sector China also dominates.
China’s dominance also undercuts Europe’s own tech sector and comes with risks
of economic coercion. Until only a few years ago, European firms were
competitive, before being undercut by heavily subsidized Chinese products, said
Tobias Gehrke, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign
Relations. China on the other hand does not allow foreign firms in its market
because of cybersecurity concerns, he said.
The European Union previously developed a 5G security toolbox to reduce its
dependence on Huawei over these fears.
It is also working on a similar initiative, known as the ICT supply chain
toolbox, to help national governments scan their wider digital infrastructure
for weak points, with a view to blocking or reduce the use of “high-risk
suppliers.”
According to Groothuis and Lexmann, “binding legislation to restrict risky
vendors in our critical infrastructure is urgently required” across the European
Union. Until legislation is passed, the EU should put temporary measures in
place, they said in their letter.
Huawei did not respond to requests for comment before publication.
This article has been updated.
BRUSSELS — Almost 60 members of the European Parliament want to include a gift
in the bloc’s next long-term budget: a phone with more storage for Ursula von
der Leyen.
Right-wing politicians filed an amendment on Thursday to the EU’s budget bill,
telling the EU executive to “dedicate sufficient funding to provide the
president of the Commission with a mobile phone with adequate storage capacity
and appropriate IT support to ensure that messages are preserved without
exception.”
Von der Leyen got in hot water last month over a deleted 2024 text message she
received from French President Emmanuel Macron that POLITICO reported had urged
her to block the EU-Mercosur trade deal.
The Commission said the message was auto-deleted, defending von der Leyen’s use
of disappearing messages as being, in part, “for space reasons.” But tech
experts debunked that defense as “a non-argument” and ” hard to believe,”
because text messages hardly take any space on modern phones.
The Commission president already faced an investigation earlier over text
conversations with Pfizer’s Chief Executive Officer Albert Bourla about Covid-19
vaccine contracts which were never archived.
Lawmakers are due to vote on the EU’s draft budget for 2026 at a plenary session
in Strasbourg next week.
The amendment on phone storage came from Germany far-right member Christine
Anderson and Swedish hard-right member Charlie Weimers. It had been signed by 57
members of parliament on Thursday, largely from Weimers’ European Conservative
and Reformists group, Anderson’s Europe Sovereign Nations and the far-right
Patriots for Europe.
The amendment urged the EU executive to mind “importance of keeping proper
records of all official communications of the Commission.”
Enrico Letta is president of the Jacques Delors Institute and a former prime
minister of Italy. Pascal Lamy is vice-president of the Paris Peace Forum and a
former European commissioner for Trade. Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović is co-chair of
the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and a former president of Croatia. They
are all members of the Governing Board of the new Jacques Delors Friends of
Europe Foundation.
For too long, the European project has been treated like an à la carte menu.
Leaders cherry-pick advantages, blame Brussels for the compromises they’ve
accepted, and leave citizens to bear the consequences of watered-down decisions
and years-long delays.
This habit of the political dodge, of agreeing in public and unraveling at home,
has dented public trust, and it must stop. By 2028, Europe must complete the
single market — not in slogans but in the concrete areas that shape everyday
life, like energy, telecommunications, savings and investments, and the free
circulation of knowledge and innovation.
A real single market in these fields will deliver tangible benefits for
citizens: Harmonized energy markets mean cross-border trade of electricity and
gas, stabilized supplies and lower bills when markets work properly. Unified
telecoms will reduce roaming and domestic price monopolies, improve service and
widen access. Integrated capital markets will give savers better returns,
channel funds to growing firms and make loans cheaper for small businesses. And
removing barriers to research and data flows will allow students, scientists and
entrepreneurs to collaborate and scale up without coming up against national
borders.
In short: more choice, lower costs, better opportunities and faster innovation.
Alongside these priorities, Europe must also adopt what Enrico Letta and others
call the “28th regime” — a mechanism that allows individuals and businesses to
operate under uniform EU standards when national rules obstruct progress.
Voluntary pioneers shouldn’t be hostage to vetoes from lone capitals. Where
national foot-dragging denies benefits to citizens elsewhere, European law
should offer an alternate path to deliver those benefits.
This is about fairness and security. The fragmented status quo leaves households
overpaying for energy, students facing unequal digital access and entrepreneurs
boxed into tiny domestic markets. It also weakens Europe geopolitically:
Fragmented energy systems increase vulnerability to hostile suppliers;
disjointed capital markets amplify financial shocks; and splintered telecoms and
digital rules hamper our ability to control critical infrastructure and data
flows.
Deadlines force choices and sharpen political will — without them, the default
remains delay. Europe’s leaders thus need to set a clear, nonnegotiable deadline
to complete the single market in energy, telecoms, capital and knowledge by
2028. And here are the concrete steps they must take:
First, they must institutionalize the fifth freedom — the free circulation of
knowledge and innovation — by removing regulatory barriers to research
collaboration, data exchange, university partnerships and mobility for knowledge
workers.
Next, they need to adopt EU-wide rules where national governments block
progress. Activating the 28th-regime concept will allow willing member countries
and their citizens to benefit, even if one or two vetoers refuse to move.
Then, break energy silos by fast-tracking cross-border interconnectors,
harmonizing grid and wholesale market rules, and prioritizing joint procurement
to prevent costly duplication. Also, unify telecoms by eliminating burdensome
national licensing, promoting Pan-European operators, and creating a regulatory
environment that rewards competition and coverage.
Europe’s leaders thus need to set a clear, nonnegotiable deadline to complete
the single market in energy, telecoms, capital and knowledge by 2028. | Thierry
Monasse/Getty Images
Finally, complete the capital markets union through the Savings and Investments
Union, linking finance to the real economy and fostering investments in the
common goods that Europe needs, such as innovation and digital, security, and
the fight against climate change.
Completing the single market must also go hand in hand with security and
resilience. If Europe is to spend billions on defense, those investments must
translate to more than trophies for national procurement agencies. We need a
single market for defense, with interoperable equipment, joint procurement,
shared standards and industrial cooperation. Defense purchases need to build
common capabilities — not 27 bespoke systems that can’t communicate with each
other.
Societal resilience matters too. Authoritarian and malign actors weaponize
disinformation, exploit social divisions and erode trust in institutions.
Fighting disinformation is as much about strengthening communities as it is
about policing platforms, and Europe must invest in civic resilience.
We must also be clear-eyed about enlargement. Ukraine’s and Moldova’s resilience
have shown democratic determination in the face of Russian aggression, and their
efforts should inspire concrete progress.
Former European Commission President Jacques Delors called enlargement “our
duty” — and he was right. Widening the single market to include the Western
Balkans, Ukraine and Moldova, while rigorously enforcing rule of law and
democratic standards, is not charity. It’s a strategic investment in Europe’s
security and prosperity.
Europe now faces a stark choice: Inertia on the one hand, meaning fragmented
markets, stranded talent, fragile societies and rising illiberalism; or
integration on the other — a single market that lowers costs, boosts
competitiveness, enhances security and renews citizens’ trust.
The 2028 deadline shouldn’t be seen as a slogan. It’s a contract with Europeans
who want results, not reassurances. And leaders must treat it as such.
Delors said Europe needs a soul. Today, it needs delivery. Let’s strengthen our
defenses and societies, meet our duty to our neighbors and finish the job. Let’s
do it by 2028.