The European Parliament on Wednesday called for a Europe-wide minimum threshold of 16 for minors to access social media without their parents’ consent. Parliament members also want the EU to hold tech CEOs like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk personally liable should their platforms consistently violate the EU’s provisions on protecting minors online — a suggested provision that was added by Hungarian social-democrat member Dóra Dávid, who previously worked for Meta. The call for tougher rules on social media comes as several EU countries prepare more restrictions on social media for kids, following concerns about the effects on mental health and development of platforms like TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and others. Australia is in the process of implementing an age limit of 16 for users of social media accounts. The European Parliament backed an age limit in its report on how to better protect minors online, with 483 members voting in favor, 92 against and 86 abstaining. The report called on the European Commission to ensure that laws and measures on age checks are consistent across the bloc. Several countries are rushing to develop their own national checks. The bulk of the votes against and abstentions came from political groups on the right, who have argued that the report goes too far into EU countries’ competencies. The report was led by Danish social-democrat Christel Schaldemose, who also led Parliament’s work on the Digital Services Act, the EU’s content moderation regulation. The report could influence upcoming negotiations on EU law. The Commission is set to propose two legislative acts that will include heavy chunks on minor protections next year: the review of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and a new Digital Fairness Act.

TOURNAI, Belgium — Back in 2016, a freak storm destroyed the entire strawberry crop on Hugues Falys’ farm in the province of Hainaut in west Belgium. It was one of a long string of unusual natural calamities that have ravaged his farm, and which he says are becoming more frequent because of climate change. Falys now wants those responsible for the climate crisis to pay him for the damage done — and he’s chosen as his target one of the world’s biggest oil companies: TotalEnergies. In a packed courtroom in the local town of Tournai, backed by a group of NGOs and a team of lawyers, Falys last week made his case to the judges that the French fossil fuel giant should be held responsible for the climate disasters that have decimated his yields. It’s likely to be a tricky case to make. TotalEnergies, which has yet to present its side of the case in court, told POLITICO in a statement that making a single producer responsible for the collective impact of centuries of fossil fuel use “makes no sense.” But the stakes are undeniably high: If Falys is successful, it could create a massive legal precedent and open a floodgate for similar litigation against other fossil fuel companies across Europe and beyond. “It’s a historic day,” Falys told a crowd outside the courtroom. “The courts could force multinationals to change their practices.” A TOUGH ROW TO HOE While burning fossil fuels is almost universally accepted as the chief cause of global warming, the impact is cumulative and global, the responsibility of innumerable groups over more than two centuries. Pinning the blame on one company — even one as huge as TotalEnergies, which emits as much CO2 every year as the whole of the U.K. combined — is difficult, and most legal attempts to do so have failed. Citing these arguments, TotalEnergies denies it’s responsible for worsening the droughts and storms that Falys has experienced on his farm in recent years. The case is part of a broader movement of strategic litigation that aims to test the courts and their ability to enforce changes on the oil and gas industry. More than 2,900 climate litigation cases have been filed globally to date. “It’s the first time that a court, at least in Belgium, can recognize the legal responsibility, the accountability of one of those carbon polluters in the climate damages that citizens, and also farmers like Hugues, are suffering and have already suffered in the previous decade,” Joeri Thijs, a spokesperson for Greenpeace Belgium, told POLITICO in front of the courtroom. MAKING HISTORY Previous attempts to pin the effects of climate change on a single emitter have mostly failed, like when a Peruvian farmer sued German energy company RWE arguing its emissions contributed to melting glaciers putting his village at risk of flooding. But Thijs said that “the legal context internationally has changed over the past year” and pointed to the recent “game-changer” legal opinion of the International Court of Justice, which establishes the obligations of countries in the fight against climate change. TotalEnergies, which has yet to present its side of the case in court. | Gregoire Campione/Getty Images “There have been several … opinions that clearly give this accountability to companies and to governments; and so we really hope that the judge will also take this into account in his judgment,” he said. Because “there are various actors who maintain this status quo of a fossil-based economy … it is important that there are different lawsuits in different parts of the world, for different victims, against different companies,” said Matthias Petel, a member of the environment committee of the Human Rights League, an NGO that is also one of the plaintiffs in the case. Falys’ lawsuit is “building on the successes” of recent cases like the one pitting Friends of the Earth Netherlands against oil giant Shell, he told POLITICO. But it’s also trying to go “one step further” by not only looking backward at the historical contribution of private actors to climate change to seek financial compensation, he explained, but also looking forward to force these companies to change their investment policies and align them with the goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. “We are not just asking them to compensate the victim, we are asking them to transform their entire investment model in the years to come,” Petel said. DIRECT IMPACTS In recent years, Falys, who has been a cattle farmer for more than 35 years, has had to put up with more frequent extreme weather events. The 2016 storm that decimated his strawberry crop also destroyed most of his potatoes. In 2018, 2020 and 2022, heat waves and droughts affected his yields and his cows, preventing him from harvesting enough fodder for his animals and forcing him to buy feed from elsewhere. These events also started affecting his mental health on top of his finances, he told POLITICO. “I have experienced climate change first-hand,” he said. “It impacted my farm, but also my everyday life and even my morale.” Falys says he’s tried to adapt to the changing climate. He transitioned to organic farming, stopped using chemical pesticides and fertilizers on his farm, and even had to reduce the size of his herd to keep it sustainable. Yet he feels that his efforts are being “undermined by the fact that carbon majors like TotalEnergies continue to explore for new [fossil fuel] fields, further increasing their harmful impact on the climate.” FIVE FAULTS Falys’ lawyers spent more than six hours last Wednesday quoting scientific reports and climate studies aimed at showing the judges the direct link between TotalEnergies’ fossil fuel production, the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from their use, and their contribution to climate change and the extreme weather events that hit Falys’ farm. They want TotalEnergies to pay reparations for the damages Falys suffered. But they’re also asking the court to order the company to stop investing in new fossil fuel projects, to drastically reduce its emissions, and to adopt a transition plan that is in line with the 2015 Paris climate agreement. Falys’ lawsuit is “building on the successes” of recent cases like the one pitting Friends of the Earth Netherlands against oil giant Shell, he told POLITICO. | Klaudia Radecka/Getty Images TotalEnergies’ culpability derives from five main faults, the lawyers argued. They claimed the French oil giant continued to exploit fossil fuels despite knowing the impact of their related emissions on climate change; it fabricated doubt about scientific findings establishing this connection; it lobbied against stricter measures to tackle global warming; it adopted a transition strategy that is not aligned with the goals of the Paris agreement; and it engaged in greenwashing, misleading its customers when promoting its activities in Belgium. “Every ton [of CO2 emissions] counts, every fraction of warming matters” to stop climate change, the lawyers hammered all day on Wednesday. “Imposing these orders would have direct impacts on alleviating Mr. Falys’ climate anxiety,” lawyer Marie Doutrepont told the court, urging the judges “to be brave,” follow through on their responsibilities to protect human rights, and ensure that if polluters don’t want to change their practices voluntarily, “one must force them to.” TOTAL’S RESPONSE But the French oil major retorted that Falys’ action “is not legitimate” and has “no legal basis.” In a statement shared with POLITICO, TotalEnergies said that trying to “make a single, long-standing oil and gas producer (which accounts for just under 2 percent of the oil and gas sector and is not active in coal) bear a responsibility that would be associated with the way in which the European and global energy system has been built over more than a century … makes no sense.” Because climate change is a global issue and multiple actors contribute to it, TotalEnergies cannot hold individual responsibility for it, the fossil fuel giant argues. It also said that the company is reducing its emissions and investing in renewable energy, and that targeted, sector-specific regulations would be a more appropriate way to advance the energy transition rather than legal action. The French company challenges the assertion that it committed any faults, saying its activities “are perfectly lawful” and that the firm “strictly complies with the applicable national and European regulations in this area.” TotalEnergies’ legal counsel will have six hours to present their arguments during a second round of hearings on Nov. 26 in Tournai. The court is expected to rule in the first half of next year.

French prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation into TikTok for failing to safeguard the mental health of children on its platforms. It’s the first time the protection of minors on social media has led to criminal proceedings, marking a significant escalation in regulators’ push to protect children on the internet. The probe comes after a parliamentary inquiry led by Socialist lawmaker Arthur Delaporte, which presented its findings on Sept. 11. A criminal investigation was opened by the Paris police’s cybercrime unit at the end of October, Delaporte wrote in a press release welcoming the news. “Our commission’s empirical observation is that of an algorithmic trap that, in just a few interactions, increases exposure to harmful, anxiety-inducing, and depressing content,” he previously said. TikTok is regulated as a Very Large Online Platform by the European Commission under the EU’s Digital Services Act. The EU has been investigating TikTok for lapses in the protection of child users. TikTok and the Commission did not immediately respond to POLITICO’s request for comment.

The mastermind of President Donald Trump’s effort to downsize the federal workforce, Russ Vought, promised to use the government shutdown to advance his goal of “shuttering the bureaucracy.” Presented with a layoff plan that would have moved in that direction, officials at the Department of Health and Human Services scaled it way back, POLITICO has learned. It was another example, like several during the layoffs led by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency this spring, in which Trump’s agency heads have pushed back successfully against top-down cuts they viewed as reckless. POLITICO obtained an HHS document from late September, the shutdown’s eve, that said the department wanted to cut nearly 8,000 jobs, based on guidance from Vought’s budget office. On Oct. 10, HHS only went ahead with 1,760. In the two weeks since, the number has dwindled to 954, as the department has rescinded nearly half of the total, blaming a coding error. The disorganized handling of the layoffs is reminiscent of Musk’s DOGE effort, in which employees were rehired after being fired, sometimes on court orders, sometimes because agency officials objected. In each case, the layoffs rattled agency managers and traumatized employees, as Vought wanted, but haven’t gone nearly as far in downsizing the government as forecast. While the nearly 8,000-person layoff plan this month was largely scuttled by top agency officials who intervened before the cuts could be made, the whiplash manner in which it was proposed and then scaled back shows that the administration is still following the DOGE playbook. “These appear to be leftovers from DOGE. I don’t know anyone — including in the White House — who supports such cuts,” a senior administration official told POLITICO in explaining the pullback from the promised mass layoffs. The official, granted anonymity to discuss confidential matters, pointed to the involvement of a staffer who was part of the DOGE effort in producing the administration document. That document came to its initial tally of 7,885 layoffs at HHS by adding employees who would be furloughed during the shutdown, as well as workers in divisions that would be shuttered if Congress passed Trump’s fiscal 2026 budget proposal. Trump’s May budget plan called for a 25 percent cut to HHS, but lawmakers have rejected it in the appropriations bills now in process. HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard told POLITICO in a statement that HHS made its layoff list “based upon positions designated as non-essential prior to the Democrat-led government shutdown.” She added: “Due to a recent court order, HHS is not currently taking actions to implement or administer the reduction-in-force notices.” According to the document reviewed by POLITICO, the National Institutes of Health was to take the hardest hit among HHS agencies, 4,545 layoffs, or roughly a quarter of its workforce. It ended up firing no one. A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the firing of 362 of the 954 HHS employees who did receive the October layoff notices. More will be shielded after additional federal employee unions joined the lawsuit on Wednesday. In congressional testimony earlier this year, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he had downsized his department’s staff to 62,000 from 82,000 when he took office. He’s nowhere close. An HHS contingency plan produced in advance of the shutdown said the department still employed 79,717. Employees who took a Sept. 30 buyout offer from Musk would bring that lower, though the number who did is unknown because the White House has not released agency-by-agency totals and has stopped publishing agency employment updates. It’s unclear who within the Trump administration came up with the initial plan for the shutdown layoffs. Hilliard did not respond to POLITICO’s question about who within HHS was responsible. Thomas Nagy, the HHS deputy assistant secretary for human resources, has been the one updating the judge, Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, about the layoffs. The experience of the fired 954, whose last work day is scheduled for early December, mirrors the chaos of DOGE’s spring layoffs, in which employees were left wondering whether they still had jobs amidst lawsuits and officials were forced to backtrack and rehire fired workers. In one such instance, Kennedy told a House panel in June that he had appealed directly to Vought to make sure Head Start funding was protected after the early education and health care program was left out of the president’s budget proposal. In another case, HHS fired and then rehired an award-winning Parkinson’s researcher. Kennedy also told senators that he brought back hundreds of staffers at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. That came after West Virginia Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito and others protested. Now many HHS employees are having déjà vu. The situation is reminiscent of the experience some former employees of the U.S. Agency for International Development had during the Trump administration dismantling of the foreign aid agency early this year. Some furloughed employees at HHS, for example, didn’t have access to their work emails to receive notices informing them they were laid off this month. “There were individuals who didn’t even know if they were in RIF status until they got the hard copy packet in the mail two days ago,” a laid-off employee at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said, using the acronym for “reduction-in-force.” A similar situation played out at HHS’ Office of Population Affairs, where nearly all of the roughly 50 employees were laid off two weeks ago, according to one person with knowledge of the situation speaking anonymously for fear of retribution. The office, which is congressionally mandated, manages hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for family planning and teen pregnancy prevention programs. Three fired employees from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration — granted anonymity to provide details about the firings without fear of retribution — said that many of the roughly 170 employees cut from the agency earlier this month are getting physical copies of their termination notices mailed to them because they’re shut out of their email accounts. “DOGE never really left, it just looks different now,” one of the SAMHSA employees said. Amanda Friedman and Sophie Gardner contributed reporting. Tim Röhn is a global reporter at Axel Springer and head of investigations for WELT, POLITICO Germany and Business Insider Germany.

Mortality rates for young adults have increased in Eastern Europe over the past decade, despite global death rates falling. Drug-use, suicide and war are among the causes of death that are rising in Eastern Europe, while earthquakes and climate-related disasters have also pushed up death rates in the region. The Global Burden of Disease report — published in The Lancet on Sunday and presented at the World Health Summit in Berlin — analyzed data from more than 200 countries and territories to estimate the leading causes of illness, mortality and early death worldwide from 1990 to 2023. Between 2000 and 2023, there was a notable rise in deaths among younger adults in Eastern Europe caused by HIV, self-harm and personal violence. In Central Europe, deaths from mental disorders and eating disorders have also risen sharply among teens over the decade. This reflects a global trend — a rise in mental health disorders, with worldwide rates of anxiety increasing by 63 percent and of depression by 26 percent. “The rise of depression and anxiety is very concerning,” coauthor Chris Murray, director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington, told POLITICO. “We hear a lot of debate as to what the root causes are … but we certainly need to pay attention to try to figure out what’s driving the rise. “ The report shows some overall positive trends: Global mortality rates dropped by 67 percent between 1950 and 2023 and global life expectancy in 2023 was more than 20 years higher compared to 1950. But despite the improvements, the study also highlights “an emerging crisis” of higher death rates in teenagers and young adults in certain regions. In North America and Latin America, for example, deaths among young people increased significantly from 2011 to 2023, mainly due to suicide, drug overdose and high consumption of alcohol. In sub-Saharan Africa, they increased due to infectious diseases and unintentional injuries. In Eastern Europe, the largest increases in mortality were among those aged 15-19 year and 20-24 years, with rates increasing by 54 percent and 40 percent, respectively, between 2011 and 2023. The report also tracks leading causes of mortality worldwide. It found that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) now account for nearly two-thirds of the world’s total mortality and morbidity, led by ischemic heart disease, stroke and diabetes. In particular, in lower-middle and upper-middle income countries there is a “very rapid transition towards non-communicable diseases,” said Murray, driven by factors such as an aging population, slow or no progress on tobacco and air pollution, and rising levels of obesity. In Central Europe and North America, these chronic diseases were primarily driven by an increase in drug use disorders, according to the report. Diabetes and kidney disease also largely contributed to the increase in Central Europe, along with several other regions. “Addressing these trends requires targeted public health interventions, improved health-care access, and socioeconomic policies to mitigate the underlying risk factors,” the report authors urge. The researchers estimate that half of all deaths and disability could be prevented by tackling high levels of blood sugar, overweight and obesity, for example.    The report also points out how conflict has “begun to shift from north Africa and the Middle East to central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia,” in recent years due to Russia’s war in Ukraine. This has led to a rise in injury-related deaths. Palestine had the highest mortality rate due to conflict and terrorism of any country in the world. While injury-related deaths caused by specific natural disasters, such as the 2023 earthquake in Turkey and the 2022-23 heatwaves in Europe, are also on the rise. “In central and eastern Europe, heatwaves have been occurring more frequently over the past decade,” the authors said.

Epilepsy affects 50 million people globally and 6 million in the EU.1 Despite this, it is a chronically underfunded and underserved condition in need of strategic investment. The latest report from Headway1 — a survey dedicated to tracking and analysing epilepsy care in the EU — underscores the urgent funding gap across the EU in epilepsy care. At the launch of the latest report in Brussels, members of the European Parliament, advocacy and patient organizations, key industry leaders, and I discussed the current picture painted by the report, and the decisions we must make to support the European epilepsy community.  Overcoming barriers to epilepsy care  Epilepsy continues to be one of the most significant neurological conditions across Europe. As the fourth most common neurological disorder,2 it takes a startling toll on people’s health. People with epilepsy tend to have more physical problems (such as fractures and bruising from injuries related to seizures), as well as higher rates of psychological conditions, including anxiety and depression.3 Defined as a chronic non-communicable neurological disease, epilepsy is characterized by unprovoked seizures often associated with neurobiological, cognitive and social consequences.4   Despite the size of the patient population, the condition is often hidden and therefore heavily stigmatized, with such stigma contributing to a crisis of care. Nearly 40 percent of people living with epilepsy in Europe remain untreated, a figure that rises as high as 90 percent in underserved areas.5 Moreover, individuals with epilepsy have more than a twofold increased risk of premature death compared with the general population, and their life expectancy is reduced by approximately 10-12 years.6   > Individuals with epilepsy have more than a twofold increased risk of premature > death compared with the general population, and their life expectancy is > reduced by approximately 10-12 years. Epilepsy is not currently recognized in some countries as a brain disorder, and while new treatments have been coming to the EU, the scarce investment in brain health impacts access to care, which is already unequal — subject to geographic lottery, socioeconomic status and gender. Additionally, the stigma associated with epilepsy, alongside limited seizure control, significantly hinders social and economic inclusion, resulting in individuals with epilepsy feeling isolated, engaged in lower employment rates and without long-term financial security.   Addressing these barriers is not just a healthcare imperative, but a societal one  via Angelini Pharma Embracing brain capital  Central to the Headway report is the concept of ‘brain capital’. This framework underscores that investing in brain health, including epilepsy, is a robust economic strategy. Avoidable epilepsy-related costs are estimated to reach €49.2 billion annually within the EU27 and the U.K., which is approximately 0.28 percent of the combined GDP of the EU and the U.K.. These figures include €20.1 billion in direct costs and €29 billion in indirect costs.7   > Avoidable epilepsy-related costs are estimated to reach €49.2 billion annually > within the EU27 and the U.K., which is approximately 0.28 percent of the > combined GDP of the EU and the U.K. The Headway report outlines three return-on-investment models that address both the human and financial costs:  1. Closing the treatment gap by ensuring timely access to appropriate care could yield a return on investment of €1.9 for every €1 invested.8,9,10  2. Addressing psychiatric comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression, by integrating mental health support into standard epilepsy care can offer a return of €1.5 per €1 spent.11,12 This intervention is critical, as mental health disorders often exacerbate the challenges faced by individuals with epilepsy.  3. Preventing avoidable cases through public health strategies such as stroke prevention and improved perinatal care could present a return of €1.7 per €1 spent.13   If national health systems across the EU and the U.K. invest €1 in each of these targeted actions and allocate a larger portion of their total national healthcare budgets to brain health services such as diagnostics testing, hospitalizations and antiseizure medications, to name a few, it’s obvious that it repays itself. It also yields an additional €0.50-€0.90 in reduced healthcare spending and increased productivity of patients and caregivers. In a climate of tight healthcare budgets and growing demand, these findings provide an evidence-based roadmap to better care and stronger systems.  A unified approach to a healthier future  The Headway report is a clear wake-up call for European policymakers to prioritize epilepsy as part of the broader brain health agenda. By investing in epilepsy care and engaging the public, countries will not only improve individual health outcomes but also realize substantial economic and societal benefits in both the short and long term. Moreover, they can lead the way in global best practice by scaling up proven solutions such as deploying epilepsy-specialist nurses and modernizing clinical trial regulations, especially for complex studies, to promote person-centered care and improve outcomes.  > By investing in epilepsy care and engaging the public, countries will not only > improve individual health outcomes but also realize substantial economic and > societal benefits. Countries should establish dedicated additional funding for epilepsy and brain health research within the forthcoming EU Brain Health Partnership and Horizon Europe. Additionally, strengthening cross-border networks like EpiCARE and aligning with the World Health Organization’s IGAP framework will support EU member states and the U.K. in implementing effective national responses, improve access to highly specialized care and shared expertise, and knowledge from the inclusion of patient-reported indicators and real-world evidence. Epilepsy should be included as a distinct priority in the EU’s and member states’ mental health strategies with tailored indicators and goals for the best possible outcomes.  > The Headway report lay the foundation for a clear path to a more resilient and > inclusive society, one that ensures a future where every individual living > with epilepsy has the opportunity to thrive. The EU27 and the U.K. stand at a crossroads. The research we’ve done, the insights we’ve discussed in Brussels and the findings outlined clearly in the Headway report lay the foundation for a clear path to a more resilient and inclusive society, one that ensures a future where every individual living with epilepsy has the opportunity to thrive. The need now is for committed action. It is crucial that policymakers, medical and healthcare professionals, and those living with epilepsy come together to effect change, improve access to treatment and turn our vision into reality.  > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Szaflaraski M (2014), “Social determinants of health in epilepsy” 2. TEHA on GBD 2021 Nervous System Disorders Collaborators (2024), “Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systemic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” 2025 3. World Health Organisation. Epilepsy. Signs and Symptoms. Available online here: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy. (Accessed August 2025] 4. Fisher RS, et al. Epilepsia 2014;55: 475-482 5. IBE, ILAE, WHO (2011), “Epilepsy in the WHO European Region.” and European Parliament (2011), “Proceedings of the workshop ‘Treating and living with Epilepsy’” 6. Thurman DJ et al. (2014), “The burden of premature mortality of epilepsy in high-income countries: A systematic review from the Mortality Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy”. Epilepsia. 7. TEHA on Begley C et al. (2022), “The global cost of epilepsy: A systematic review and extrapolation”, Strzelczyk et al. (2015), “Costs of epilepsy and cost‐driving factors in children, adolescents, and their caregivers in Germany”, and Willems LM et al. (2021), “Multicenter, cross-sectional study of the costs of illness andcost-driving factors in adult patients with epilepsy”, 2025 8. Kwon C et al. (2022), “The worldwide epilepsy treatment gap: A systematic review and recommendations for revised definitions – A report from the ILAE Epidemiology Commission”. Epilepsia. 9. De Zélicourt M et al. (2014), “Management of focal epilepsy in adults treated with polytherapy in France: The direct cost of drug resistance (ESPERA study)”. Seizure. 10. Willems LM et al. (2022), “Multicenter, cross-sectional study of the costs of illness and cost-driving factors in adult patients with epilepsy”. Epilepsia 11. Dewhurst E et al. (2015), “A prospective service evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy”. Epilepsy & Behavior. 12. TEHA Group elaboration on OECD data and Fleishman JA et al. (2006), “Using the SF-12 health status measure to improve predictions of medical expenditures”. Medical Care 13. The European House of Ambrosetti and Angelini Pharma. (2025) Brain Health in Uncertain Times: A strategic investment for Europe’s future

Poland wants to ban shop booze sales at night to curb excessive drinking, cut crime and prevent ill health, after Warsaw city tried and failed to outlaw them. Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s coalition partners — The Left and centrist Poland 2050 — have submitted legislative proposals including broad alcohol advertising bans, outlawing off-license sales from at least 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. and curbs on alcohol sales at petrol stations and online. The coalition partners say these measures, consistent with World Health Organization recommendations, are among the most effective tools to prevent alcohol-related poor health, such as cancer and mental health disorders. Latvia enforced similar measures from August. EU health data places Poland among the bloc’s worst performers on alcohol-related mortality: The country ranked second in the EU for alcohol-attributable deaths, behind Slovenia, in 2022, Eurostat said in March. The push for a nationwide ban follows the collapse of plans for a citywide proposal in Warsaw, after the local council threw out the measure over failure to agree. Warsaw’s failed attempt highlights the divergence between political groups on such public health measures, even inside Tusk’s ruling coalition. Councilors rebelled against the proposal tabled by their own mayor, Rafał Trzaskowski, arguing it impinged civil liberties. Trzaskowski pledged to keep trying to institute the ban.   It also comes as global leaders failed to agree to a political declaration to curb chronic diseases, such as those caused by drinking, underscoring the difficulty in agreeing to proven public health measures in a politically divided arena. In Poland, Warsaw city’s policy failure came despite overwhelming support among the local Varsovians when the city hall had tried to gauge the mood among people. Warsaw’s failed attempt highlights the divergence between political groups on such public health measures, even inside Donald Tusk’s ruling coalition. | Jonathan Raa/Getty Images Joanna Wicha, an MP for The Left, told POLITICO many local governments often lack determination and courage to ban nighttime booze sales. “That is why a top-down ban is needed,” she said. She hinted Tusk’s backing could help make the bans reality.  Currently, the proposals are undergoing public consultation and the parliament is expected to begin work on them in late October or early November, she said. SATURATED Poland is awash with booze shops. There were nearly 119,000 shops selling alcohol in Poland at the end of 2023, from small privately owned stores to large grocery chains, to 24-hour gas stations, Poland’s health ministry said in January. By contrast, Sweden has 900 alcohol stores, one per roughly 11,000 people, compared with one for every 320 people in Poland. To date, some 180 Polish municipalities already operate some form of nighttime prohibition, including in Kraków — Poland’s top tourist destination. Warsaw eventually ended up passing trial bans in two of the city’s 18 districts, but critics say it’s nowhere near effective. In locations where bans have been in place, police reports say the effects have been positive — less crime, more security in the streets and fewer patients at emergency wards — according to local media. “I would prefer local governments to follow the example of those that consistently try to counter the effects of what I call ‘liberal alcoholism,’ Especially in big cities, the presence of drunk people late at night near homes or in city centers is anything but pleasant,” Tusk said Sept. 22. The Left’s draft would ban sales at petrol stations and in long-term rehabilitation facilities and impose a 10 p.m.–6 a.m. national ban, with the option for local councils to widen the restriction to start at 9 p.m. and end at 9 a.m. It would also mandate age checks for every purchase and forbid selling below the combined level of excise and VAT, as is often the case in supermarket promotions. Poland 2050 also wants to let local authorities extend bans to 9 a.m. and to adjust licenses that have not been changed in 23 years. FEW INCENTIVES TO DRINK LESS The country’s National Center for Counteracting Addictions, or KCPU, a government agency coordinating policies on drug and alcohol abuse, estimates the social cost from alcohol in Poland at roughly 93 billion złoty (€21.8 billion) a year, compared with just 14 billion złoty in excise revenues. Poland’s per-capita consumption of pure alcohol stood at 8.8 liters in 2024, dropping steadily from 9.7 liters in 2021 due to lower beer consumption, according to KCPU data. Spirits, meanwhile, have held steady. WHO data shows Poles drink more than the bloc’s average. Cheap booze may be a reason: In 2024, an average monthly wage would buy about 2,103 half-liter bottles of beer — the highest since at least 2002. Affordability of other alcohol types has also been rising. By contrast, Sweden has 900 alcohol stores, one per roughly 11,000 people, compared with one for every 320 people in Poland. | Xavi Lopez/Getty Images The drinks industry has mobilized against sweeping curbs. “The proposed bill is a populist overregulation drafted in a wave of emotion and a chaotic set of changes that do not account for consumption trends or market realities,” Browary Polskie said in a statement. The brewers’ lobby argues beer volumes have been sliding for years: Sales have fallen some 15 percent over six years, and in the first nine months of this year the category declined a further 7-8 percent, while beer prices rose around 45 percent in recent years. Browary Polskie also complained that the draft would sweep in nonalcoholic beer — a product that, they say, helps reduce alcohol intake — and hit domestic brewers disproportionately. “Entrepreneurs are again surprised by legislative initiatives that threaten business stability,” Karol Stec, head of the spirits industry employers’ group, told the national newswire PAP.

Sweden’s health minister has urged the EU to push ahead with social media restrictions for kids while insisting it be treated as a pressing matter. “We’re losing an entire generation to endless scrolling and harmful content, and we need to do something about it,” Minister Jakob Forssmed told POLITICO, adding that social media use among youth is the “most pressing health issue there is.” His comments follow those of European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, who said Europe could adopt a similar approach to Australia. The country is set to ban social media for all users under 16. In her State of the Union address in Strasbourg earlier this week, she pledged to commission a panel of experts to study the impact of the Australian measure and provide recommendations on how Europe should proceed. Forssmed said Europe should move quickly, warning: “We don’t have the time. We need to move forward fast.” Sweden has already compiled research that demonstrates the impact on young people, he said, and the results are clear. “This is a risk for mental health issues. We see it not least when it comes to eating disorders and harmful self-image,” he added. Health authorities in Sweden issued guidelines last year, stating that children under the age of two should not be exposed to any screens and teenagers should have no more than three hours of screen time per day. The government also announced an inquiry into social media use and age restrictions. In Denmark, Minister for Digital Affairs Caroline Stage Olsen also said she would support stronger measures from Brussels and would make it one of the “main priorities” for the Danish presidency of the Council of the EU. “I see three steps on the EU level: mandatory legal requirement for age verification, a ban on harmful and addictive practices for minors and stronger enforcement,” she told POLITICO. Denmark has imposed a ban on smartphones in schools since February, following France’s lead in 2018. A similar ban in Belgium came into effect this month. Five EU countries — Denmark, Greece, France, Italy and Spain — are testing a European Commission age verification app, a new system designed to protect children online. Last year, Ireland’s Department of Health established an online health task force to examine the links between specific types of online activity and physical and mental health harms to children and young people.  It’s also developing a strategic public health response to these harms, which it will bring forward in its final report next month.  Von der Leyen suggested she would wait to decide on EU-wide measures until she had received analysis of the Australian policy. It’s unclear how long European experts will have to do that, given that it comes into force in Australia on Dec. 10, and she wants the panel’s recommendations by year’s end.